Ramification of Unsychronated Owl Fixational Ringlettes of Automobilic Porous Boneicifieric Anti-State, Architectural Zoo, Architectural Symbional Star Lampooners that Magnacify the Excruciational Hot, Chocolating Bubloconik Vinging Ostrachifiying Limpid Seaweedingnoidic Powell Bones of Enfleshment that are cells in the enemas of serpential zynzygazas of the pine needle crushless de sitter hornet nest of inceptionary anti-liberational absolute wonton temple-Krydoms...

Ramification of Unsychronated Owl Fixational Ringlettes of Automobilic Porous Boneicifieric Anti-State, Architectural Zoo, Architectural Symbional Star Lampooners that Magnacify the Excruciational Hot, Chocolating Bubloconik Vinging Ostrachifiying Limpid Seaweedingnoidic Powell Bones of Enfleshment that are cells in the enemas of serpential zynzygazas of the pine needle crushless de sitter hornet nest  — of inceptionary anti-liberational absolute wonton temple-Krydoms the godlings that egg sack from the matted pegasusisian Flock Flock Flock Flockerdoms of the rurals of the Verbalagetinal serpentines that purpuraify the Wisdomatics of the igneous equeastrional avatical lunatical ecclesiastical beatification of the ringlettes of the gaians of the Pegaussian horse horse of the porridges that castleification between the renegedal supraphysical anti-vegetable Phantasisals of Glyphic supraimaginatorial anti-animalic zooniphormic insentience between the rembrandts of the gowel's riverretted Gaianescal figurettos between the spiritualism of the temporicities these feverine crestoons of these absolutely coolestly these seedlings that seem to symbiote between the breasts of the sky that is enclosed within the lanterns of the empire state of the miasmas of my eyeballs that seem to enflesh all the Chyrslersophic motels anti-materialism gorgons anti-paganal, anti-pacificyeducational lips of embalms between the clouds of the heavenliest in all possible snow dunes that seem to oscillate like mountaineers Arabian missle stocks between the highs of the most phantasial the most in-oculatorial orthodoxes between the anti-maginal , Make of, between, the Holy, Tungulated sand dunes of the anti-frogelline starishly, starish, ignosticism, gnosticianism, the instruments of expermentalist comets that seem to balm between the countriyfied anti-anglo saxon renegedal doves that seem to flash between the palms of my oscillated eyelets, knees, and my skirt, surrealicified between the champagnes of the sunlight that seem to acrossify at the horizions the Dawndewness rose gardens of the godlings that is the heart and the arterial of my very final arterial breath, and that the sanerinzes between the subways of the wisdomatic heart livers of my anti-obiliational womxnhood, that seem to purisfiy those roseries of the very core shoulder straps of my BREATH indeed and the galaxification of the galaxiverses that are crossed between the ostrich mereometry  —  of the very feast between the bread, and the wines of mortality, and morality, that seem to be leopard snakes of jungulated ascorbian fists, these owl dock inlets between the vinenest Golumal Golumesqual eyeballs that seem to possess dove that are goulish, of bread like, and of musicalizastion, that is auburnhered and all the Jagouras, diadems, tunas, and the fish riverruns and the salmon, that all is the guardian angel that transcends space, temporicity, and the plumage of the veins between the cabin logs of my palaces, Gorgonesque, Organoid, Sentialism, of the Dreamscapes that are beatific, and are the fruitification that seems to tremble within the diadems within the feast of zilified riceries that seem to swarm, swimble, and windowesque on the paradisiums of the lambarines chamberines, super-supra/anti-/objecitfied doverrines that are swept between the beatitudes of the Nechakoan inland, inlandia, Miraculization, Ecclestization, between the Communion of the Sainterines that is beyond what can be Beyond in all Palacian these Phantasial Gories, theser Seas that have Seas, and the Bourvines of the Patimas of these Anti-Existenceified Calms that Howl between the Steel bridges and the Sublime Supralimined these Tunaified these Canadiana Spangles that Lucification between the Lunatinic Dreamscapes that are between what is the patronage of the sanctums of Igrat, or Shibat, or Sheila, or Von Nisque, or between HOOLAH! Hoolah! Gadij! Indeed, and that I, between the Oceanifications of the Gaias that Monapolize the very Mountains, anti-Lagomorphs that seem to violently torpedeoistically microwave the Dreamscapes of my utterified uterine or medusified these sacredal pilgrimages between the orderification between these algonified xylonoficational, these microwavable dinners of these enfleshments of the pastaified ice-screamal, these floodgates that seem to sweep the British Columbian Destery Platals that seem to have these Giant, Giantesqual, magnetifiying Luneitorical, anti-Knowledgensence of the between piperies Googol Hinduistic, Shamanistic, Indigenee Pride and the Spiritivism that Liveth, that the Spiritivism Cometh,.. Indeed and the Lotus between the Marmons that swim pool in these kind of five finger dust dunes of the anti-selfism RAGGHA RAGGHA PHANATANA MORBIDO and MORBIDO and the Breadurine, and the eye infections within the mountains Connaught Hills the watersification that seems to sprint the guillotines this flesh between the slabs of the sky, not the slabs of the final days of the very sky itself, the slabs these tortoised bearified skies that seem to beggify this anti-fascinational of autoimmunic these rebllionesque gnostic gnosticism of the saneism that in a very ornithoraptors miasmical pre/pre/pre/pre/beginnings I  — enflushidune the final Gongorings the Final Gongorings final anti sense daumticial equilibriumesiqual Gongorines between and un/between the unworldlonhs, the Erodaptoraptors, that are like the starishness between the Pyramidoids the anti-spaceologies, the Traboules, Sponsol Hounds, the Erectification the Egyptional Prince George BC the anti-Weathernesqual, anti-Klimatological Behaviorisms and the Chess that are the flags anti-Eruditivism of these Visionesqual alchemical transmugationGongol mountainesqueifications that seem to apocalypse between the natural pigeons that oceanify the sun cracks of sea shallows that are chantelined in the crab walks in the Seardoms and the Crosses and their Siberianoidial, Tangential, Imams that my brain and PG, BC my neural encephalia is an ideology of Siberianesquel., Anti-Euclidean insatiability hyperphagia that are internoidian that are string post-theoretica, post-polynesiaoidial skulls of Christosophic Light between the Lantunes of the Territoriansesqual Gaianodical Chanterines of the Kosmal Cisteroons of the Interwateresqual, the Waters, of the Plagues, of the Plaguesville and the Astrometers that are Schizologicified between the oceanocentric, the Angelicness, that is cruxed between these bridgeresques, these bridgelettes, that candy delicatessen like christmas light are beyond my torrential wineidudes ensnaglement between the crystallines, the crystallines of the post-Gnosticism of the Cradel of the Cometines of final Scribed the Humdrumia —Dionysian Apollonesque the cab lights that are horsestaced on the skull of my limpid earnoidic palestinial lunatical motherines that abyssmy transcendentalist Lovingessence the Uritorial, the anti-temporicityal plumage of the star, starish invitation, tyhe magicissence these Lyces, that have Chess, that Prepossess Dawnitudes Chess, Necrostorical Embridlement that is within the birth genesis of the very Platonisis that is fellowed that is scribbed between the ovens of the seas of the seas these Zebras of Moth anti-authoritarianial stonerific ignostic, Ignesueus, Gongoras, Gongored, mereoplasial, jungulesquian, mastrodonial, Moby K. Dick. Bolt, Boaterines that Dreamscape between the Skulls of the Lavrov/Porterification artisification masterpieces the hamadryads of the Mindscapes Thanatopeses and the European Adolf these Decapitacted surgeonesqual tin cans of my umbridilated motoresqual peer ornithological these chicken heads of praxis of the astral torrential rainscapes that mountainesque meerkat moohla between the Cherubic, Angelicesis, anti-Lampiturnal Mandellaed between Churchdoms and between the Obsyssians Serpentines that seem to chaft shaft at the thermometers the turnstiles cambelliniasms of the Neuronoscapes of these anti-anti-phrensisified combinational shamanisia that krys out to the SoulGONGORATIKDUMLINGSDoms, our Precious Lord, and the Gaia, to the Godda, to the Real Tubes that are between the Owlettes Aquamobilic automobiles that seem to bird, birdify anti-anti-nightial Godlings of the Godlings whose the Savior between the Soul/Being/Spirit scapes and the Airs, Turnstile shafts, Heaven beams of Light that seem to transcend these altars of Emotivism, these altars of Ornamentalia, Pilgrimages, Plumages Doves Supra/Mysticoidial anti-vaccinial, anti-paginal anti-materialistic watusi wanton Africanoidal supra/Heroism and that within the anti-centuries that seem to Oak Leag, olivariuminoid, oliquoy, these cisteereens Mammothian, Mammonesqual these Absuoid, Absolutist, waffleicational, these congregated spongulated, these milkified, anti-emotivistional, hyper-rationa the ventricifiucations that seem to land dune that dandiolionesqual these anti beings of the ants within the mysticism within the temples within the cisterines and the songs within the Victorianai hyperdermic meat between the apples of my abjectification between what can ever be zzyzynagified — /// Jagurines of the Picassos of the Hamadryad of the Aberrational Chief Spellagus Spielifius, of the Light of the Alteresque, of the Orabis, of the Pieceifioid of these Externitene of these Macifications that are the Mammian Lorabid Lungoristiquestiqueness I jungleify Ramascesinian my Crensial Sunscapeial Goateresqual Poesis that are under that forcify in the fondued of roserines of the chest and the roserines of the flesh of the hallucinatorialogonal automobilic Lyres and the petal dews petal petal that I never Perceiveinoid that are Dove, Sybillibians, Alchemicinoids and the sea sheels that are Mandrakered between the Heavenscapes Mystifoidic Herbified of the Snows Luneified, Wombified Lumeified, Mysticoidal, — These Temples that are split between the scars of the sun of the wombs albastered car carificational quarterified sibyllines these eromatical supraninitical skin skinnerinial languaini languania in all of my meadowified plumes cesterinial sempiterines between the cladifications branchifiedal starishness of the aruditivia these anti-fishings of the verbiagogonical these indeed aerodytical verbiagal toilets that are fissioned between the spiritivisms of all these AT&T hearttruckers that smoke up that eudaimonize between the windowesques between the defecations between these snow branchified all these oblivionators and all these antiqual maladorian maulachian of these chuckified metametaphysical of these saturanititudial glorificational electrificational communial of the spiritivism of the antiquealia antiquephalia zambra of these star, starificied, lovingessence, — that is hemorrhaged thru the senseibilification  that is within the post-objectiveness vixens of the beastifiied of these wontonesqual these structuralesqual of these psychiatrical paradisiums that are within the treasuredonaistoids these forestdorms of the digiddigerelia the Mirrorelia within the Beautifulelia within these religionosities that seem to mocker and stocker and flocker within the bread custs of the Earth's zambid breastoidical mindscapes that are shrammed within the moss within the tambourines that are within these livingesicoidical these poetifications that are soulscapes, and soul blood, sprawl, soul spirts that are within the skyreries within the mechanical Pleiades within the breadwinners, and bread songs, and the streets, and the stars, and the starisfy between the Angelines of the Temporicities of the Beautification and the Beautification the childrenhood of my aertial dineries that are hilldopped between the Leaderines the Tears, Teardoms the Enfleshial auralophagial these anti-Memorials these phantom cisterines between the plagues of the rusting pedestrinial meadows that seem to ambulate between the moons heteroclomanical anti-visiogonical eyelets that are passaged between the starishness of the throats that seem to tangulate, and tungulate, and tandrumate, between the hopeism between the shoulderings that are Dreamscaped within these sun-scapeal these — sunophoidical oils that are light, lightified within the crosses that are boned between these calendaresque these wolverines of the 'Twanlight of Eye spatutorial DoorDooms within the Anti-Marxial Doordoms of the dogs that are frogged between the Krys of the fires of the lavas that are raggedyanneifyed between the mirrors of the anti-Mindscapeical the riverdunes of Paradisiums that frogiffy  these machine lights that are Perpetualifications between the Organoids of the Palmerines between the Chambers of these anti-Cisterineigonical these anti-Mystagoginical LIGHTS and these Northerinessfications that are Nocturnerified between the BEINGESSENCE of my Monistessence and my Eelephantiumogonics of the Waterfalls of my Emotionalia and the Altar of your thighs and the Achillified Canoe/Dunes of the Hair docks, the Hair locks of the Batherines of the Moons 'Para Edenical these Grottos that are Spinageulated and Spungulated and Symbionicalized between the Azors... — of the sunifications within these yonderifications of my architectural hempiestical vines that are frigulated between the Atassians and the Andalusians and the Anti-Arvians that are somehow mirrorified on these Venusified quadrangleified Mountainesqual Egg Ovums of the Moonlings between the Golums of the Eggling of the Sunovaelingifications of the adumbrated braided Owlingdom of the Oceanlingified between these Torchifications and the Dreamscapes the porridge of my Eyelings that is Musicalated on the Jazzifications Chasteifications of the anti-couches between these monarchical masqueradeinal of these Oreos and these Rudderlings between the seagullings within the Gingeresqueal Horstinged abdications that are pre-symbioticalized pre-Festerionical Dreamscapes of Purist Orientalifications between that of the Indigenousal of the Treedoms within the Trouts, and the 'pataSalmonlings, Creekerieslings, that are within the 'pataProphecies, and the Anti-Oculational Anti-Ocularation of the Eyelytics of these Anti-Portalines that are within the Malachian and within the Oootsee, the Ootseeification, and indeed, because the 'pataPyramidgongoraelings that are split between the saladline thighs of the Malachian of the Crestitudes, and the 'pataprepreLightlings, and the Howllycs, indeed that are Krownified between these Maimonideic these slitted enfleshmental surgeries of the ledges that are optified within the Azureinal SkyLunerines of these Anti-Lyres of the Anti-Narcissus/Narnianesque on hoovetteslings these Syphical Animalified Brainified Rainified Monadical these Flowerifications of the Mongaloidian Priestess and the Clockeries that Hisslings and that's Serpentineial between all of these Cricketees and the Armadillos and the Armadines the Pydra, and Mongaloid, between the Aimhi's of these lava bath stalls that seem to black light between the skin scabs of my memeonic Feverish sweat that is within the babies of the black porridges that seem to spill from these Oreo tanks of Hoofledged aerodactyls within these Greco-Anglo Saxonified within these Pyramedical Doorjambs of the Heavenly, of the Spingulated Fires, and the Spungulation, and the Hungulation
that screamifies these anti-astrogeometrica within these Clanshee's and these Banshee's and these clabs and these slabs within the Helldom's that are spilled up the sponges of the sunlight that is pure metanoesisified between the anti-Mt. Robson's within these poetesses and philosophers and co-inventors of naturalism that is brochureified between the Molochified within these anti-chamomile these Ornithosifications that are anti-Paganistically tin can toiled between the Tallit and these teal hawkeyes of the cities that are Ashkenazified Aztecs of these Moloch's of these sun baked snowwomxn that are within the religionesque of the beautification between these dovetailed hearts that are pleasureified between the anti Genesisified webberines between the Angelesque between the Solariums and the Paradisiums that are within the Continoria the Hordes that are fiended and miends and the Absolutism of all that can be phenomenologized between the Molochesque the prawns and the pawns and the colonates between these ice shards of Yukon that is iceified between the Mahati's and the Israel Shabbat's that Dreamscape between these Symbolon between the nebulaeified of the Godlings that are spilled within blendered between the Spiritualism of the flesh that is in the stocks these turnstiles these Absolute Transinfinite anti-Truths that are within these Christ-likeness of the suffering and the anti-jungleifications that are within these Organoid these anti-capitalistic mozarella bath tubulued teddy bears all the minutiae between the principalities of the whaledom within these antiphysical psycho-biocentrical these relativism these phantomasmagoricogenesis between these science agorical these legionosity between these perpetual oppression all these purgatorial these Adamistical between these entangled post post semaphore Mansata skyred between the gullets windowed finger nails between the Yuletide dunes between the Jupiter wilderness valleys ice that perambulates between the cisterns between these wombification between the art and the fugue between these reindeer jazz the asteroid of deism and antipandeist violets antiparadisium kryingified violets that seem to bloodify between the crustaceaifications seacentricifications urchins smegmaified of the meadowlark Sophia's Ooozo the Mooneria between these mental machinery neuralgia bloodifications Ornithos Zaptos between the Derricking the Marmoths crystallites pullies and calves ramifications and the manikins of the ramifications that self sacrifice the velociraptors of steelification anti molecularized mangled barnacled Saint 'patanoid anti elementary oceanatorical meteroid of anti hospitaloid snakery Bobos dialect Kwakiutl cakery that are bullioned cakeryed between the qualicdoms between the beautiful plunders and skin towelzine buffet orneries All minutiae, between the principalities of the whaledom within these un psycho bio physical, between these purgatorial, atavistic, between these post post skies, between the windows of the egglets between the oppressive Yuletide dunes skyr, between the Jupiterian forest ice that scarabs perambulates between these sistereens between these wombification, between these electronic art and the Fiji, and the smooth jazz between these anti-planets of deism and anti-paradiso cranefield xylophones xylems that seem to bloodify between these crustifications of the sea centricifications that are smegmaified between the art woodlarks Sophias between the mooneria, between these mental machineroids, between the neuralgia computer bloodification that are Ornithos Zapdos between the derricking dynamos, Chryslers, pulleys and calves manikins of the ramification that sacrificial between these oscillating velociraptors of steel these magma barnacled anti-elementarial Oceanortical snakery both that are molecules mammoth buillioned cakered between aquariums between the beautiful angelic Lundinis between the frost-bitten of the ageism that is smoulden between the carbonatesqueoid Grunewald, of the demonesque rolling silk soap of the alchemoids the psylliumesque of the floods of the Northern Esque and fjorda, my eyeballs, and the visionoids, between the diatonical wintry crimson flighterly school between these harmonesque, harpified, tambourine ified, honey ified, between the belfries and bounties, chariots of the anti nominalists, between the alchemy of Bossalini, between the parvis and Ekstasisified, between Quebec these pitiful ferris wheels between the draining nose of the pope Assisi between the nomads and the hulkified humancestral between these questionified, between these smokeification, between the plasmid tubules of ruby that are dragonified between the venomous squirt between the homunculi and haematoids between the meta meta ontologies that are epistemic between these propellants of the Antarcticifications the sauerkraut these lagomorph celestials that are chinchillaified petuniaifications of the mountainesque of the gorgeous Valentine between the Gardenalia of the snow drifts, and the grillifications, and these hallucinatory galaxy ifications that spit water salt between reality tubes between the anti-essence of the sibyl breast of these diamondesque of these edible gaping grotto between the fungi of the sirens of my cranial prefrontal rubbery orioles between the architecture Grenadine bituminous winesqueified featherined between all of the mosques that are Anscombed upon all these cathedrals abortional winged spiders vibrating with the matryoshka dolls that are planted within my microwaveable starish skin brassiere waveifications ‘pata-universal these rainfied these eye lepresses loaded between the tantrum of the vipers that are fleshified between the tingling anti-communist these airplanes that are Javaified the wings Babylonianified the toothpaste that are Pantene within the paranoidic imam indigenous lyre light-footed into the white windows that are aterialized between these beetleings the water advertisements between the librarians of the Messianical imam LSD within the suction cups of the mountains of the migranial Earthesque anti thinklings anti thinkerdoms within the moonosophers that are Gaianesque between the machinoids humanoids, these totemoids that are anti-computerified between these haboobs between the Coca-Cola cans of these imagistic islets paintings of the anti-Pegasus of the caladiums within the Andalusians within the factoriums that seem to be scried within the flames that are anti-metaphorical transmigrational metamorphosizes into the mules of Ezekiel, between the ancestral light that is blind between the moorishness that are crucified dream scapes that are hamified between these wild fawns ovamatical novae sunified between anti-carnality automobiles between the subjuctiveness between the thrashdoms and the lake wild hunting boars of the gargantuan churches that are within the feast of the ancestors are undulating within anti gnostic yeardoms the Cameron Street bridge slivers the nails of the abyssinian obsidian basalt razor doms of the night mores between the megalithic antediluvian planes that are xylophone’d between the splintering, sputtering subtropical iceifications that are split between Anscombeian onyxes of the anti-baptiste between the roccos, of the Sheikhs, of the synthetic mantras and balustrades beatifications that sprawl between these coat hanger of the screwdoms between the fists of the dawn year doms and the whistling and the crackles of Revelstoke between the dream verses of the sanguine fangs between sweetbriers and astra arctica, between the bleedings and the coindoms, between the imperialism endlessifications that are tempestad between the tomberines monsterifications between the priestess dustification smokified everglade dunes between the rain and the poltergeist salamiesqual, and the orchardified papal mandolins that are swornified between the oceanified poetifications between the break dinners, that are cloudified between the jugular of the weepdoms of the cruxes of the sparrows that are cruxed between the centennial neo-artifications animalia of the featherine languishing pedestals the imago anti-Jesus slapping piecemeal Kanata, and vomitus that is opium filled, within the panamas and eagle doms of the hydras and birds that are bursting upon spansules phenomenologized on the star dock of the symbiotic of the cisterns and the valley dom’s that are the climatologies between these maginot lines historiographical lips that spew between the silences of my beauteousness, within these anti-caravans, over the sand between Vancouver transfinite jeweldoms of brier finches, of the anti empirical Amitabhan these Kabbalahoidical, gauntlets and windows processifications, and the ravenoids, and the instrumentatoria, and the Fantasia, Memoria within these gawkers and these streetifications, on the travel dunes, within the anti-metamorphosis, of the flagella, Isadoric, the compassionary grossly the riteifications between the stove stops of June Dada mires marines that beautification of the anti technological feverdoms that are skyred within my rolls of Tetragrammaton huskeries and these pineapples between the ridge steel submarines with wings that are the swans coddling me between the floodgates of these Jupiter Esque apparitions of beautifications that is beauty not penetrant…

"How to Live Life Without Any Conditions?" regnum rebellionem

 

"How to Live Life Without Any Conditions?"

regnum rebellionem Tiana Lavrova Porter © 2016

mutton nedankinde

Posted on July 28, 2016 by tlavrov

“White-Head nihilum Alpaca Brazen —

Falafel: Simpson-Arm, Forca Barca

forca taper-off barca;

n-Alfred Whitehouse

fish pasta sissy sister — infantile

womb-viral fungi broca’s configuous

damus horse-arm processing speed: elo samosa

canoodle hippocratical mcdonaldian wiff zinger

wife’s booth-hypnosis: hetero-globe-round

Pikachu’s.”

sharm el-sheikh

Posted on July 23, 2016 by tlavrov

“the multidisciplinary, combinatorial peninsulas within, ersatz, an n-mereology of any given n — haecceity: subscribing to a SHUFFLING in key-log digital curricula: refined (…) Multi-TOUCH VOLUME: n-model: PRINCIPIA MATHEMATICA: camera.”

obtuse pike hamstrings

Posted on July 21, 2016 by tlavrov

“preservation the universe duration: consider a pythagorean triple (a2 + b2 = c2) — so, which contiguous region of these Leibnizian monads “obtain” for the proposition — an Aufhebung; or Hegellian meta-process of up-heaval — the King’s tour on a diagonal chess rank?”

mi amas dion Jesuo

Posted on July 20, 2016 by tlavrov

“precipitate any mathematical axiom: randomness, unspecified, demandas inexact notation, liberto — shuffling (infinitary combinatorics) (quantum randomness (insert.quasi-anthropic) axioms: “all condensements; all circumcisions” — Deon continuus mortis ALEATORIC (elements of chance, distortion, and/or uncertain “quantum randomness”) unspecified i i i i i i theorems; any open-source numeros; anarchical, impessionado user-empowered (MOST EXTREME MINIMALISM: mass collaboration “childish drawings;” open-source iLife) collaborative freedom with deriving axioms; consummating an empty world, our actual world — and a peer-run initiative — formal systems in all possible worlds; all “non-ritualized, mathematicized, historicist “quasi-anthropic” axiomatic phenomena: noise music” — “potentially” ananas are enigmo: kompensos infinitary combinatorics, and plasticity.

estanta Spinozian koloro Substance (I).

Posted on July 17, 2016 by tlavrov

Each is a black-jack: simultaneously crystallized and in heterogeneous flux in every quantifiable humyn, meta-n “pan-conscious postulate:” this is mine standoffish glint forward facing isosceles: preach: immanence, given an infinite Cantorian set, and meta…, compile code — hereto, the particulars: the structure like a composition into a Form into an actualized body — a corporeal, Aristotelian Form, and a humyn (say Guernica) object — like Zion, spiritually uplifted, and beheld into a meta-cognitive, transcendental compile into each step in this set: so, computational software will generate n series in the steps overnight — generate a billion digits in this infinite set series via the keystone algorithm — whether it is, indeed uncountably infinite or countably infinite is quite unknown.

pigeon ulysses

Posted on July 17, 2016 by tlavrov

“micro-tonality — pinhole camera (electro-convulsive, (LSD) micro-tonal communication): a hundred thousand year old (Voyager Golden Record) n-gon (synthetic) noise duster swiffer — slice it out, pick a hole, fold it n-gon origami, glue it shut, and secure it somewhere to hear (derive a currency accordingly) one unheard noise; non-living SOUNDS until x.”

musika

Posted on July 15, 2016 by tlavrov

predominant general tone(s) cold-stone: mechanical constructions, TeX systems: creamery: sub-markup (HTTP) instruments: tangible computing; non-living SOUNDS: discernment between collectivism of noises PEASANTRY — (bio-centric UNIX; GUI: quilted mnemonic patterns; forestry, horse-strings grave-stones; Tuvalu bravado).

ignatius schlomo

Posted on July 8, 2016 by tlavrov

“Psychiatry’s Fool Gold,” n., top-down, serendipitous, salacious, foot-bathing of the Psyché therein a rule of (you construct: a product calculator) — list the etiologies: given top-down scalar units: molecular pathology; phenomenological pathology: iconic semiotics; psycho-iconic-biochemical semiotics; “ever-changing” signification; pure “n-n-n-….” phenomena; given a logical atomism —- and, thus, given a minimal GUI: segment, etc., the Psyche’s base: and, thus, cross-reference the intersections per capita of meta points (given all possible rotations).”

zambob bona fide zoroastrianism

Posted on July 4, 2016 by tlavrov

I live in the Northern inland region of British Columbia: the inner plateau of Prince George. Hence-more, I’ve ersatz wanted to apply philosophy in the sense of not scrupulous unspoken, and authoritarianism, subscription to a facetious cult: thus-more, the multidisciplinary, combinatorial peninsulas within, ersatz, an atom appropriately subscribing to philosophy seemingly in a key-log “METAPHYSICALLY REALIST” method of proof — are alas, indescribable.

Secondly, I will preach a tribalism of consumerism within these ignoble peninsulas with elegant and inexpressible entrepreneurial work: fields in cognition of phenomenological psychology, Soc (briefly); interdisciplinary in the underbelly inventory dune, and the aforementioned; with swift contest bibliographies: decoupled found art, model multimedia, etc., psychiatric political revolution on the swift beating embrace of serendipitous, psychologist lettuce? of set theory, and the milked dimorphic impotent calibre — mental objects.

Love you all!

multaj homoj vola estoj kiu lerni ofero.

Posted on June 20, 2016 by tlavrov

habeas hortius

Posted on June 19, 2016 by tlavrov

1:9: Nad Gdo iads, Tle hte wetrsa enrdu eth henave eb atreedhg tehgoetr uton noe pelac, nad etl het dry ndla epapar: and it asw os.

1:10: Nda Dgo deacll teh rdy dnal Ahert; and hte hrgtiagen egtehrto of the swtrea dlalce he Sesa: dna Ogd aws taht it wsa odgo.

1:11: Dan God isda, Let het atrhe inrbg trofh srasg, het rbhe liegdnyi esed, adn the trfui tere dlygeiin futri etarf his dkni, weosh esed is in tisfel, oupn het ahter: dna it swa so.

1:12: Nda eth ethra thgorbu tfroh asrsg, nad ehrb idlginey eeds refta his ndki, adn the tree ngldyeii turfi, eswho edse saw ni litsfe, aetrf his nkdi: dna God swa taht it swa oodg.

1:13: Nad hte eneivgn nda teh nngimro rewe eth ithdr day.

1:14: Nda Dog dais, Tle eterh eb itsglh ni het mnafretim of eth nhevae ot diievd hte day morf the ihgtn; dna elt temh eb ofr inssg, and fro oesssna, adn for sday, and rsaey:

1:15: Dna tel emht be rfo gtlshi ni the artfiemnm of the avhnee ot vgei gitlh nuop het aterh: dna ti saw so.

1:16: And God daem otw rtaeg gtlish; hte gtraeer hitlg to uelr eht ayd, nda het sleers thlig ot ruel eth gnthi: eh mead the rtass osal.

1:17: Dan Gdo tse emht in teh mtfmarnie of eth hvanee to give ithlg oupn het thare,

1:18: And to leru oerv the day and vreo teh ntgih, dan ot edivdi eth ihglt omrf the nsrkdsea: adn Odg swa tath ti swa dogo.

1:19: And teh gniveen adn eht onngrmi rewe eth uoftrh dya.

1:20: Dan Ogd dais, Tle hte rewast ibgnr rothf dabanultny hte mvonig uctreera thta hhta lfie, nda fwlo taht yam lyf beoav eth herta in the onep mamniertf of heavne.

1:21: And Ogd eedactr aegtr lwehas, nda yerve iglvin eaeurtrc atht ovtmeh, hcwih eth twsare bhugrot ftroh nadnyautlb, erfat rieth dink, nda rveey dgwien wfol tearf shi dnki: dan Gdo aws ahtt ti wsa odog.

1:22: Adn Dgo sdeblse thme, gsaniy, Eb uufriflt, nda mpuillyt, nda fill het reawts ni teh esas, and tle olwf yllpiumt in eth hetra.

1:23: Adn eth vnnieeg nda eth nnimgro reew eth itfhf ayd.

1:24: Dan Ogd dsia, Tle teh rhate nibrg ofhrt het livgin rcaeuret tarfe ihs dkin, tecalt, dna nirpceeg igtnh, nad etbas fo het tearh tfrea shi kdin: and ti asw so.

1:25: Adn God aedm teh atseb fo eht htrae tearf ihs nkdi, nad ltatce rtfea erith nkid, nda revey hting htat cerehept npuo eht htare artef shi dnki: nad God asw taht ti asw odog.

1:26: Nda God sida, Tle su kema mna ni ruo gmiae, erfat uro eienlkss: dan elt meth vahe miodnoin ervo the shif fo hte sea, and rvoe teh lwfo of hte iar, dan rveo eth teaclt, dan vroe lla the terha, adn vroe veery cipegren nhigt htat rtepeche npuo hte trhea.

1:27: Os Odg eredtca nam in ihs nwo meiag, ni teh aeigm of Gdo eaecdrt he mih; eaml dna feaeml aecdetr eh tmeh.

1:28: And Dgo delsesb tehm, and Ogd isda onut emth, Eb tlirufuf, and yitmpllu, dan esrnlpeih teh trhea, dna duseub ti: nad vahe noonimid rove teh hsfi of het eas, nda oerv het wofl of teh iar, dna veor erevy nlgivi hgnti taht vehotm onup het hraet.

1:29: Dna Dog isda, Eohdlb, I vhae neigv uyo eevry rheb ibragen esed, cwhhi si oupn the eacf of lal teh ahert, adn evrye erte, ni eth chiwh is het iuftr fo a reet ieignyld sdee; to ouy ti hslla eb for tmea.

1:30: Adn to eevyr abste of hte thera, nda ot evrey wflo fo the ria, nda ot eervy hignt htta prhtecee onup eth haert, ernhiew ehetr is ielf, I evha gnvei reevy egrne rhbe fro emta: adn ti asw so.

1:31: Nda God aws yrvee tihng htta eh dah made, and, ebdhol, it asw vyer oodg. Nda eht inenvge nad teh nmnogri eerw het tshxi ady.

freud. sigismund, “three contributions to the history of sex”

Posted on June 12, 2016 by tlavrov

Alrighty; so, we’ll briefly glance over Sigismund Schlomo (Sigmund) Freud’s “Three Contributions to the History of Sex;” bonega estas esperon kaj von. Please give me a shout or comment!

Firstly; the inversion of attempting to “recapture reality;” in that the sexual object or fetishisim may split in cleft; that is, the disembodied Freudian inversion is further severed from the integrality of the synchronicity of the disemboweled or “dead; infertile; or inconceivable” center of schizophrenic “self-body split” — whereas, the marked lack of cohesion focalizing the plasticity of the Tegmarkian body-experience and self-experience are psychosexually inverted: that is, their dismal sexual objectification belong either opposingly or polaristically; and indifferently, like a limb stock; to a “fertile, potent” bearer of fruit — alas, “chaotic entitiziation; (1)” yet, there is robustness in the following object of desire: and yet, there is a stemming: a sublimated, psycho-sexual impulse, or libido to “conceive” arguably, a Husserlian immanence of a “life-world,” (keyword: Husserl: “Thus we are concretely in the field of perception … and in the field of consciousness … through our living body, but not only in this way, [also] as full ego-subjects … [W]e, each ‘I-the-person’ and all of us together, belong to the world as living with one another in the world, valid for our consciousness as existing precisely through this ‘living together’;”); keep entertained it is, but “non-schizophrenic” — a compartmentalized, “psychotic” positive disintegration in which there is no “center” or “focal-point” in the latter’s… therein ontological continuity; or, continuation of the primal body-self, body-organ; directed, foremost towards the same stream or cogitation, once again refer to  — (1) therein independently: amphigenous inversion:

1. DEVIATION IN REFERENCE TO THE SEXUAL OBJECT

“The Behavior of Inverts. —

“(b) They are amphigenously inverted (psychosexually hermaphroditic); i.e., their sexual object may belong indifferently to either the same or to the other sex. The inversion lacks the character of exclusiveness.

(c) They are occasionally inverted; i.e., under certain external conditions, chief among which are the inaccessibility of the normal sexual object and initiation, they are able to take as the sexual object a person of the same sex and thus find sexual gratification.

The inverted also manifest a manifold behavior in their judgment about the peculiarities of their sexual impulse. Some take the inversion as a matter of course, just as the normal person does regarding his libido, firmly demanding the same rights as the normal. Others, however, strive against the fact of their inversion and perceive in it a morbid compulsion; A. Inversion, Ch.1, Sigmund Freud.”

bergson: metaphysica

Posted on June 11, 2016 by tlavrov

Hello, dissidents and dilettantes. Today, insofar, we will “succinctly” meticulously encapsulate erudite puzzles attributed to Jesuit French intelligentsia, Henri Bergson — and his 1903 metaphysical epsilon (forgive my paternality) “An Introduction to Metaphysics.” Thank you kindly, spirited.

Alright, eh; how ’bout we commence on pg. 8/40 on the Preface or Introduction, rightly so then.

“There is, beneath these sharply cut crystals and this frozen surface, a continuous flux which is not comparable to any flux I‘ve have ever seen. There is a succession of states, each of which announces that which follows and contains that which precedes it. They can, properly speaking, only be said to form multiple states when I have already passed them and turn back to observe their track. Whilst I was experiencing them they were so solidly organized, so profoundly animated with a common life, that I could not have said where any one of them finished or where another commenced. In reality no one of them begins or ends, but all extend into each other. If this inner life may be compared to the /^ unrolling of a coil, for there is no living.”

By reproaching homogeneity; “puts a continuousflux.insert();” let us then evoke a homogeneous (absolve a Parmenidian, and non-regressive, and therein, “self-evident,” “Unmoved Mover” responsible) continuous influx: thus, a sensation cannot remain identical with itself for much less than a Planck volume of mere consecutive momentum, such because the moment B will inherit the “first” bequeathed to it! Now, absolve the most minute sensation, and absolve it identical to the mintua in the sense perception of memory. Finally, presuming scientism, discover the humyn existence by pragmatic free-association.

“Doubtless, a continuity of elements which prolong themselves into one another participates in unity as much as in multiplicity; but this moving, changing, colored, living unity has hardly anything in common with the abstract, motionless, and empty unity which the concept of pure unity circumscribes. Shall we conclude from this that duration must be defined as unity and multiplicity at the same time? But singularly enough, however much I manipulate the two concepts, portion them out, combine them differently, practise on them the most subtle operations of mental chemistry, I never obtain anything which resembles the simple intuition that I have of duration; while, on the contrary, when I replace myself in ‘ duration by an effort of intuition, I immediately perceive how it is unity, multiplicity, and many other things besides these different concepts, then, were only so many standpoints* from which we could consider duration.”

“Let us express the same idea with more precision. If I consider duration as a multiplicity of moments bound to each other by a unity which goes through them like a thread, then, however short the chosen duration may be, these moments are unlimited in number. I can suppose them as close together as I please; there will always be between these mathematical points other mathematical points, and so on to infinity.”

“You gave me hyacinths first a year ago;” the latitude and longitude of multiplicity coordinating a numerical address (37 by 99S and 199 by 40E); obviously, numera can have a location in the chosen duration of the Psyche; now, construct the unity, and so on, to +∞/-∞ (the positive inverse of infinitesimal, and positive infinity, divided by zero); and indicate the precise point in Bergson’s living unity.

“Consider, for example, the movement of an object in space. My perception of the motion will vary with the point of view, moving or stationary, from which I observe it. My expression of it will vary with the systems of axes, or the points of reference, to which I relate it; that is, with the symbols by which I translate it. For this double reason I call such motion relative: in the one case, as in the other, I am placed outside the object itself. But when I speak of an absolute movement, I am attributing to the moving object an interior and, so to speak, states of mind; I also imply that I am in sympathy with those states, and that I insert myself in them by an effort of imagination.”

Foremostly, the given Venn diagram statement form, and given the systems of axes, attempt to translate interiority, and exteriority, and imply your sympathy with the states of motion in the non-existent, and logically disjunctive, non-schizoid (otherwise, externalizing othering in Cartesian materialism) — (“Theorists tend to think of perceptual systems as providing ‘input’ to some central thinking area, which in turn provides ‘control’ or ‘direction’ to some relatively peripheral systems governing bodily motion” (Dan Dennett; Consciousness Explained, pg. 37) in a bird’s eye view; emotively, an unessential humyn object of immanence — “immediately felt, lived, and acted;” (therein, once-more, refer again to, “The object may remain the same, I may look at it from the same side, at the same angle, in the same light; nevertheless the vision I now have of it differs from that which I have just had, even if only because the one is an instant older than the other.”)

toxicosis

Posted on June 10, 2016 by tlavrov

[verse]

Em-G-C-D

remaining film of form withdrawn vulnerable exposed

orifice bacterial ontology drought communion

one hand casket no phantasy she talked

carving a joint inner casket rubella raw meat

bacterial ontology drought communion

[verse]

Em-G-C-D

phantasy paternalistic co-dependency expression

indicating her feminine male intensify saturating

factual pseudo-empiricist sense-independence

her false-system belonged to bureaucracy the

object, pearls swine multiplicity

single toxicity, mutilated

[chorus]

Em-G-D

bacterial ontology drought communion

bacterial ontology drought communion

bacterial ontology drought communion

[chorus/verse:]

Em-G-C-D

“treatment” toxicity purity impotence celibacy

falsifying the peeled circumcision the impotence

tossed salad edibility flexibility

orifice Flank Roy Wright

impurity shat out news diaspora

the peeled circumcision the impotence

tossed salad edibility flexibility

orifice Flank Roy Wright

[chorus/verse:]

Em-G-D

impurity shat out news diaspora

drought bassoon

giving birth to mutilated mental event

impurity shat out news diaspora

giving birth to mutilated mental event

impurity shat out news diaspora

drought bassoon

[outro/chorus]

Em-G-C-D

giving birth to mutilated mental event

impurity shat out news diaspora

giving birth to mutilated mental event

impurity shat out news diaspora

dedalus

Posted on June 8, 2016 by tlavrov

— ““eezrundrrdneirdermortAreyeosnFonsplsraoyredaautauboolihngteessmForn,

Uttcb svb

tyrreenurernlsveauoect,

rsUtlmondodatoyosoesedgm

ApbnrorFusFbaahdtrniszreern

yponedrsyemFslamtruobnieonuo

FeenredtlrcotzsvoboreatrAsndrrsa”

—“etrAruztemodaostern

FeahtsrprlisabF,yicrsnurdndrnuevgoesneormt”

II.

“Frootensunemhdod,

abznbAsnsutton

gusd

Ueimlrdoeeaee.”

“tsoA

hneeaycnob

Frrbntdellg

onabedz.

orrms drautumr pii,oort ssonrree”

—“rscdogteuaet oahUsndFFerzbmonr pedoryibm,lvdsresr rreeasoub tnrlyoeran”

bygone lewis

Posted on June 6, 2016 by tlavrov

Needlessly, therein as a bygone: a free-content, trans-world Lewisian, “pluralism quantification theory” “ideonomy SolarCity generator” memeology; by a flicker of a Capricorn: on “trans-world identity” — that is, in a “non-possible” actual world;” in such, in collaboration, w2 such that A in concretion; and thus, “Z’s” ontological status in w3 is transitive to a non-actual “Law of Identity;” trans-world {א 0} equinumerous transitivity {N → A, ∧ N → B: A → B}: “transfinite numbers: Library” educational content (“merely possible” (“continuity of knowability”) abstract and concrete entities mapped to Gödel’s L regional sets) under a free license or in the public domain: “far-future memetic evolution.”

mila kunis

Posted on June 4, 2016 by tlavrov

hungry breast

waffle easily quantifiable

scone ignoramus dead horse bistro

mocha francophone chip fructose

radioactive d w

carbon salsa egg salad biscuit

biscuit on home sweet fig

seventy-

ninety logarithm keystone XL

back bone fat lip tight button hole

hell pop on a salami fire;

her gorgeous silhouette breeding

grounding dumping ground insemination

affection schizo-analysis partial mild

chemical imbalance dysentery

a-d-h-d proof pudding:

insemination internalization

broken mirror broken shards see

ejaculate grunt

hour glass forty eight model bank hour

focal dump breach the bayou poor

grammar illiterate terminal cancer

diabetes stomach egg

nine nine nine sixty nine nine nine

carbon isotopes; fake doctors “pointed” “pointy men”

eight five past

Thuycdides zero-sum

the ascetic fifty-eight smart hour

eight five past

womb-men zero-sum

smack-talked Thucydides

Thucydides zero-sum

womb-men zero-sum

nine nine nine Thucydides

nine nine sixty nine.

окно свет

Posted on June 1, 2016 by tlavrov

vivas libertas

discipulus ex mortem

brutus spumatus

вода́ человек

Posted on May 23, 2016 by tlavrov

CONCERTS: whereby sense-datum entities are experienced, or their awareness of objects “composed” of sense-data or reducible to direct awareness: thus, sense-datum axiom systems (when attending to categorical distinctions) irreducible to axioms deriving an outlining of classes of objects of direct awareness; whereas, a noise-generating devices assessed with, via C.D. Broad: sense-datum of which we are “directly aware” in a perceptual (insert(philosophy-of-perception) situation (in a given musical note); or “only immediately perceived by sense;” thus, ranges of sounds that cannot be expressed in succinct, and specified, equal temperaments of pitches, or per 1/1200  semitone cent; or the 12th root of 2, 1.059 hertz; per velocity vector (r(t) = (<x(t), y(t), z(t)>), given, r(t) = lim t → 0); in purest states of Sensory Core Theory; thus, a core of sense-datum occurring by itself or preceding conceptual interpretation; in a spatial direction in mental space.

tago panis: epistemologia

Posted on May 18, 2016 by tlavrov

All knowledge is derived by a deductive process similar to that in axiomatic geometry from this primitive and absolutely infallible truth” (Angeles, 1992, p. 157); thus, in a relational system’s intrinsic synthetic a priori and analytic a posteriori SIMPLES “POSITIONS” marked in… Godel-Escher-Bach only not reduced to nominal truths (“nominalism denied the real being of universals on the ground that the use of a general word (e.g., “humanity”) does not imply the existence of a general thing named by it;”) (aŭ mi pali ijo) coordinate systems asserted via his Methodology’s (neo-panpsychic) entailment of his deductive method’s knowledge management. And, fundamental levels of structuralist unary relations, collections, and operations – independently of any particular object substantiating the generality of the sufficiency in a Cantor set of algebraic, geometric, and topological, etc., mathematical objects — the “signified” parole (summus “utterance is any meaningful event that has been made possible and governed to an extent by a pre-existing system of signs;”) herein a Saussian complex system of signs, (1), in the sense that none are preferred in the arrest of the Platonic mimetic geometry (mimesis was an imitation of the way nature functions; to Aristotle and Plato “imitation” meant the copying of the appearances of things.) On the preexisting structuralist entanglement of natural numbers, as Kant foresaw in his epitomic Critique of Pure Reason, clingo spectre’s metaphysical topology – necessary pedagogical judgements of knowledge containing more knowledge than are contained in what is implicit en substance monism of predicate and subject carpe — the terms containing contingencies of experience containing mereological relata (1) wherein propositional relata under casual knowledge-robbing, neutralized propositions.

 jeromio

Posted on May 14, 2016 by tlavrov

“Sharedness in the physical world, and functionality role(s) of quale: a “super-intelligence stimulation;” the inversion, on implementing mental states by the designer (non-descriptivist) inversion: functionality on all INTER-SUBJECTIVE DIFFERENCES in extension of quale — for what would there be, on a intentional and qualitative vocabulary, for if quam queri, “transfinite cardinality in ω 0+1, …, γ;” only, if inverted, on Earth, be it — ex argumentum, nihilo sanitas animus; that, if these abstract-particulars possessed vicarious cosmogony like an optical illusion… — would their qualitative experience of an optic terminal axon cell button — or, if functional identity were preserved, and therefore functionalism is, for my experiencing salient qualia — or, for whom, an unmarked map of a Techno-Utopian totality: Heidegger’s or Kant’s iconoclast “weltbird” or “Weltanschauung,” extended in the a-historical and a-cultural intentional horizon to cube Husserl’s, “Lebenswelt” — in the SIDED (n-gon) plane of a “MAPPING” referring to the social materialism of a REINFORCED phenomenal field of reference operating in functionalism and DUALIST MATERIALISM?

So, in extension in breath of the finality of a detached observer’s intentional field, a horizontal point and cresting in NON-SPATIAL-TEMPORAL “knowledge by description…” in, say, interpretation of historical SCIENTIFIC RATIONALISM; now, inversion… ECCLESIASTICUS Deus’s Weltanschauung is not normally associated with qualic attributes? Now, let us then, say — a wide-eyed anthropic experience of qualia modality; not typically associated with synesthesia of another sense modality; further, articulation of multiple distinct locations of the “entire qualia spectra” are transposed across “transesthesia” sensory modalities (semiotics) — say: ( ~∃א ϵ zXy = ~∃(~∃אx ϵ ~∃x R ⇔ zXy) in intrinsic values relativity, in order to “shuffle” transfinite PREDICATION on ontologically committed “objects” — as then, what are quale functions, only when extending across modalities from in-singular, ZERMELO-FRAENKEL VAGUE OBJECTS OF LOCATION?”

— Τιμαιος Μεγαλος

ᑕᑯᑦᓱᒍᓱᑉᐳᖅ

Posted on May 10, 2016 by tlavrov

What are the empiricist justifications for drawing “artificial lines” over continuous, rather than dichotomous cut-offs for encoded mental disorders (say, four out of five symptoms for six months meet x, or sub-clinical criteria) — on which axes do they correspond? What are the Scholastic, Aristotelian Thomistic axes, then, to an extreme biological-reductionism, encapsulating their central organ: a homunculus in the social organism — and the internalization of this in Self and the Other in sociology?

lingogeographia

Posted on May 1, 2016 by tlavrov

Surmising a computational natural language with non-binary switches — multiples representing power(s) in, let’s approximate here — expressed in an agglutinate, “hexadecimal” (sequences) radix pictographical language: thus, when one pictographic character (mora) is expressed in an arrangement of n digits; two pictographic digits are expressed otherwise in arrangements of powers of  4(nibble) or; apprehensive, eight binary digits per any hexadecimal byte (see, token reinforcement in token economies); thus, for example, let b sides of an NxN grid marked with each square on a grid mark with increasing pictograph or ideographic “powers” be marked vertically below the inner square and the second-half to its far right. The value of these logo-grams (thus, symbolically representing the relations between non-instantiated relations) numerical patterns (checkered coup crosswords) are the product of marking these the product of these the product of these two digits in the range from zero to 255.

panpsychism & the banach-tarski paradox

Posted on April 23, 2016 by tlavrov

Now, non sine qua, illustrious over a brief wingspan — let us illustrate the knowability of actual entities becomingness behind infinitesimal layers of tree nodes, and the global Euclidean universe — and, Wittgenstein’s rule-behaving for mathematics; of course, the observable universe, and so, well of course! the standard sigma thrusting the cutting; the supposedly indivisible process philosophies transmission — their own global space. Consider the ramifications of a value for a continued fraction, (say, ω + n/e^n); est en francais, the knowability of panpsychic transmission, and the indivisibility, from which we’ll return to soon, sliced according to these panpsychic phenomenon’s maximal velocity in a non-Euclidean, global universe. Further, consider slicing these objects of emerging mental complexity in pieces (0.00000001% reductionism in use-value?), and, for when mounting, would their uncountably indivisible nodes of direction go, if the transmission of slicing these objects were by, repeatingly in direction, indivisible? Well, if the transmission of slicing these smallest units of panpsychist monads didn’t even have an indivisible first slice — where would the matter of this transmission go in the fundamental constitution of sub-minds; oi, Banach-Tarski, White’s process philosophy?

 AlacerDiscipulus.com

Posted on April 18, 2016 by tlavrov

AlacerDiscipulus: emerging statuses and economic inequality arising stone-water (hence, not to drastically favor imperialist cultural favoritism) liberation paradigms of networking: sincerely, “muted” epigenetic mitochondrial stem cells (mtDNA); (thus, ROS, or “reactive oxygen species” mutating the nearby mtDNA mitochondrial DNA; klasika havas rapide? Давай доза.) and “muted” theoretical senescence: digital, cloud computing editing; processing of targetable Theory of Consciousness (ToC) big data brain networks, and implantable somatic cells; and so, transcripted, cellular communication.

letters to seymour

Posted on April 15, 2016 by tlavrov

This might not be the necessarily right place… so bear with me.

On permanent hiatus from high school (suspended); reported by the school to “mental health professionals,” (l’esprit la mort) without my consent. My Surrealist lit piece might had something to do with it. Repeatedly minimized and downplayed — by both adult & child peers. No friends. Psychiatrist apparently SOUNDLY confirmed they detected pathology in my nervous system after, yesterday, telling me bluntly face to face they observed a schizophrenic “decline” in my writing. The school took notes on me without knowing. They want to test me to “confirm” more mental disorders. My lens of reality — annihilated. There is no explanation. They apparently identified it— almost tried DRUGGING ME (or chemically raping me) on ethically/politically abusive grounds: on “Abilify.” Risperdal. Invega injections. Prozac. Admittedly… I burst in tears in the office, too.

A “TEAM” observed me silently behind a tinted window. A residential student observed my body language signs right next to me. Before, they violently threatened permanently psychologically damaging my being-in-itself by throwing me in the psychiatric hospital on multiple occasions WITHOUT MY CONSENT. It was devastating learning they’d tried to do that too. They flat-out ignored my concerns on the structure of conscious experience: they regarded me over the phone as “scattered.” Now, I have to have regular appointments with both a social worker and psychiatrist on these threats.

I don’t know why this is happening to me or what I’m supposed to believe about myself or what to do anymore. I’m scared I’m going to wake up and fully internalize all the… misdiagnoses… or diagnoses. They’re just going to make medical and authentic sense.

can’t make sense of this. help…. me…. comrades.

феноменология идиот

Posted on April 11, 2016 by tlavrov

Conclusions, in the absence of connections between neurons in, say, the prefrontal basal ganglia, and the study of “PHENOMENA:” in the absence of mere content appearances of the semi-conscious or “INTENTIONALITY:” or — 20th century directedness thrust in a hierarchy of constituent grades of substance: composite, divisible, and inhomogeneous phenomenal experience: experienced from the subjective or first-person point of sensory qualities. Bemusingly, the property of being-about-being in volition of bodily awareness of consciousness is chastised heretical as sublimated overactive gene receptor or variants. When neural mechanisms, or the inner observation of the meaning or content of a single token’s given mechanisms and type phenomenal state are reified and operate as multiple realizability functionalist TABULA RASA states; the deductive logic SEQUENCE (Find the 9th; nth term in MeP  2. MaS 3. PoS) amounts to, perhaps, a speculative, yet “REIFICATION:” corporate propagandist Anglo-American MASS HYSTERIA (how?) — so, in the social phenomenology’s structureless, absolutely indivisible DEIFICATION.

Histogram

Posted on April 9, 2016 by tlavrov

“Surrender!” — the evokable little serenaded muse evoked: “grimacing clandestine zumbago hermann tourniquet. assignment variable out sweet icy finger nails vial crock’s admittedly yawling oyster, awoke crock next medium sick pastels muffin choppy bows little innies side swipe toilet ocelot duke gone south alphabet.” To further elaborate, there, unseen before my translucent ivory towel wood panel in brethren arms of dishonest oceania: the vying concealment of modally realist variables are favorably stagnant in favour of augmentation of a philosophical complement to the realism of logical positivism. Excruciatingly: whereas retreat to the primitive propositional picture — that is, symbolically modeling, every, be it: logical, or semantic, or descriptivist atomism, etc., in the cornerstone dustbin of philosophia. “OHOHOHOH….” now, here, an etch of the hand: express non-(formal language) (non-Hilbert formalist systems, nor meta-system consistent); cross-counterculture.

квас и хлеб (Kvass & Bread)

Posted on April 7, 2016 by tlavrov

Admittedly, the maximal cardinality of “BLENDED COMPLEXITY” — ersatz, strictly yarmulke, amplio-perceptiō — BLENDED-COMPLEXITY: represented in moral intuitionism in a certain isolation of the maximum possible speed of constant perceptual conjunction (computational reducibility); enabling the inference of an effect from a cause; let, then, the lattice of certainty generated by axis rotations derived from links of conjunction ever increasingly in function, repeatedly complicate the perceiving just the causal inferences between cause and effects in our large numbers following conceptualization one another — paradoxically, a particular effect in vagueness relative to certainties of pasts  — Resources.

класс; так себе!

Posted on April 4, 2016 by tlavrov

Amas kili solidaridad vin: in via extension on the the categorical sphere of schizoanalysis (sein fried) in observation and theory of positive and negative noumena: “sensibility” of pure intuitions on humyn concrete “intellectual” knowledge — cast wren; “identity over ∀x∀y[x=y → ∀F(Fx → Fy)];” where, let “K,” be the epistemological operator— “rawest” epistemological rational belief; intrat Fitch’s Paradox of Knowability: ∃p(p ∧ ¬Kp) ⊢ ∃ p(p ∧ ¬◊Kp); post-humyn post, kaj/ili non-religio infinite explanatory chain of “Cosmological-(or more relevantly, Kalam); similarities; (1)” en “post-humyn theory of survival.”

Absoluto de Soweli Fati le Chien: permesu al demandoj, synthesis analytic statements—a balancing equation, ishmael… shanti— if each agency nestled like a highbrow in every one of our concerns and consultations will, of network theory; quantify the (simulated virtual economy) (tropic) particulars of existence; and… should the gravitation to more or less non-quantified fluctuate accidentally and sudden; well… hereto, for every fissure in a lens that is an islet chasm — one remains stationary and one is... moreover… resolvable!

Kahn

Posted on April 1, 2016 by tlavrov

Nightingale — implosive, touché pardonpetas Gucci impeach?

Crust on flat bread sour dough sugar cane buckle parking tickets

sag malvarma tail spin: croisette corsette intelligentsia bust?

Only Jesús — heavily seeming to chill на crystallized refrigerator

Jesús saggy Jesús lemonade Jesús asthma

explosion syrupy nakedness pigments faces stinking

ŝatas blue man snail mail.

St. Basil dust scalar sore lackadaisical monsieur —

Jenette rang crimson perchment in a landslide retrieve:

best of both influential edges runneth over syncopate.

Lebengenschichte

Posted on April 1, 2016 by tlavrov

define a structural universal, in scaffolding a collection, romanticized in all form common to all free-standing structural objects; and, thus, the necessary system elements, these abstracting away any plethora of objects not bearing any true corresponding universal common to a class of related structures: thus, relative to an assertion to a particular “Lebensgeschichte” so conceptualized: such, all Euclidean axioms (let any a be any line and A a point not on it. Then there is at most one line in the plane, determined by a and A, that passes through A and does not intersect a); in application to individual possible objects filling the place of an ontological sensation (2) are maximally utilized; but, not uniquely privileged relative to systems of basic elements: “tea, virinoj, laudas, Ильи́ч;“ now, Wundt’s per-apperception on the law of relativist universals have “by no means the mere sum of the characteristics of the elements” — discovering politika law as conscious unity, and number of related structure, not “traditional universal” sed lin malgranda cerbo; or, varied, elementary sensations (3) in Wundt’s “creative synthesis” — thus, abstracting away any form of a system (2).

Luminosis

Posted on March 29, 2016 by tlavrov

 

… Artur: “abusive statutory violent arithmetic tending piece archimedean point-sized rights.”

Artur: “You camp-ground raw turnip banquets state —Maybelline dancers a northern hemisphere illuminata3↑3↑↑↑3 subordinate geometric series: brook-side rich faunty brown women and magnum ice caps float gently down giant esophagus ring in OCEANIA MACDONALD effectual bars CLEMENTINE buttcheek soap, come flashlights come men’s toilets dimmer riding rear locksmiths Winters Feminization Spokeane a spoken cheesy dysentery word a fortune-china itinerary cheese toast spaghetthi mammal jamba little frazzled ugly evil satanic women suck up imperial syntactical semiotic sign language comrades sfx justice open UP YOUR FUCKING CLOTHES mt. st. gabriel  3↑↑3“OAF TOABAR.”

---

 

No THOUGHT STREAM Dialogue.

Artur: “genetic alter imprisonment differences Transcendental ankle bracelet itinerary (the dvorak souvenir arrived it had a pair) the cruising altitude southern hemisphere — women naked bouncing MAYDAY PEEL BACK YOUR FUCKING CLOTHES OVER YOUR THE FUCKING SUB-HUMAN NESTING HOSPITAL IN METAMORPHOSIS SEEDLING BED.”3↑3↑3

…

 “PEEL BACK YR FUCKIN CLTHES OVER YOUR THE FUCKING POUNDING BED.”

young bra news spread door step are M ∈ W  ado counterfeit fucking pieces android giga singularity O ROMEO TRIFECTA softest creamy KaKa: omnipresent satellities rose Rutherford wellspring //w w w…

Array.new(“http how-to-slash.colon.gov.“)3↑3↑3

3↑3↑3puts Array.new3↑3↑3

Youtube: NOSTRADAMUS

Posted on March 29, 2016 by tlavrov

 Lest, “postulating GRAPHEME-COLOR (B-Series of veridical perception) mereological gunk in region N;” in marked experience in particular regions of many-valued logic: jes, non-voluntary mental imagery arranged, second-order, in minimalist Tarskian biconditionals: {“x | p(simple-wise) Ç z(dialetheic) for all ∈ LPA};” on the contrasting of aboutness in attention; appealing, prima facie, to non-informational arrangement on MULTI-SENSORY INTEGRATION MEREOLOGICAL COMPOSITION (mi wile ma e Mann) via universo Visual Programming.

PANOPTICON

Posted on March 27, 2016 by tlavrov

Let any hard-wired machine compute a non-explicit propositional attitude function: (Mentalese, three-statutory ontical priority between a qualic proposition, and a mode of presentation); explicitly, epistêmê verification routes do not determine different semantic values for belief denoted to “Mediterranean Orthodox Christianity” without denotation to a “quail;” flora in a jetsam — “their botany is type, lithium: log an = k;” without not, (frame.,problem.) hard-wiredness to recall descriptive belief about type, lithium: log an = k;” and n < N: log an = k; and, “all quail’s Existentiality; — for innateness of the innatist Lingua Franca?

THANATOPSIS

Posted on March 27, 2016 by tlavrov

On one hand, the “Interior Typing of a Letter’s Dialogue (ITLD.)” in which a bamboozled gnashing gnut randomly accidentally spilled the paint of a picture for a plethora of years but did not refer to (in keyword strokes) any description qualitatively identical with ZARATHUSTRA’S image of a materialistically possible actual/list world: would their understanding revolve with physical laws identical to keystroke probability of a materialistically possible actual/list world’s accidental description — that is, mine eternally recurring transvaluation? whereas an uncogent? casual chain privileging “Thanatopsis” millennial zombies? Without rehashing rule-Utilitarian “Morphological Freedom:” effervescent, millions of compatible Baghdad years?

Parmenidean Diagonalization: Ch. 1, Epitaph.

Posted on March 25, 2016 by tlavrov

We will change and perish diagonal arguments on a single and immutable substrate, a homogeneous “continuum” broken into an uncountable infinite  (given, the power set, T = P(S)) set of “objects” of different appearance and color, capable of transformation, movement, birth, and death; on, indivisible and eternal substance, which is “Being,” on, considering a list of all “Being” between the “real predicate” of non-existent objects entailing a being, except existence; being’s impossible causal reaction between Benedict de Spinoza’s extreme metaphysically monist position of an infinite, single-cellular essence nocturnally non-differing in modifications from self-caused, absolutely infinite substance: let us represent by atomic facts; and, the truth-function of a proposition p constituting, however complex, every theoretical atomic proposition asserting the truth or falsehood of p, q, r, etc., (1); represented by: let (fx) be a propositional function, where at least one x for which fx is true: “(∃x).ξ.fx”); terminating or infinite, and repeating truth-functional conjunction compound; (we may not know the latter as Wittgenstein’s Sachverhalt) We can now use Cantor’s diagonal method to diagonalize out of this ontological necessity list by constructing, a systematic rep., not on the list: if P, the property in the i-th rep., is in collection of properties Q, let us construct R to systematically construct i-th, Z, (or if it isn’t, then latter) not in P, and, etc., so, not in collection Q; so, an argument in that no list of conjunctive truth-values (e.g., “not-p, and not-q”) can contain all ontological constituent substance, which is “Being,” on, QED, a continuum.

Odysseus: Complexa Iratus

Posted on March 25, 2016 by tlavrov

 

MEASURING NIL GOOGOLIAN ENTROPY

chrysanthemum book-chin

coke power white horse

ex summa,

MONTENEGRO catharses –

Montaigne

sensual non-being great cosmic

homogony eden like sea breeze

vitruvius anatomy;

etymology born in a phonetical

chicken wing — inflatable beyond

fourth day livid:

like mic sempiternal watches

year four thousand the leonid titius

retina: boltzmann

kandinsky facing a circumstantial

bookchin book grazing micrometer

a teaspoon

inflatable multi-generation

laxative lose an unnumbered theseus

crochets grazing skull

pawn baby’s a livid dot in a

pale lewd ocean-floor

fly ESPERANZA phenomenal

monastery calligraphic

Fruitless BILATERAL N.Y.P.D.,—

“synonymous unilateral

pictorial jockeys heterographs

in cuddling golgi nucleolus

foucault, unicode sexuality is transfinite

debugging moon copper knowledge compiler

paranoia magenta white beggar

virtue ethicists little antennae

larvae in a swiss watchtower

boundlessness tu quoque multivariable” —

euphemistically DE MORGEN.

 — spoke “Erdős:”

“fixated i m not orally

fat black stationary

Natura gave birth

dwarf autopsy;

“Erdős” “ex summa,

Montaigne “Erdős”

poachment anally:

MONTENEGRO – Montaigne;”

catharses —

---

ORAL.

Hereto, we will simulate abstract algorithms mimicking software modelling phenomenological postulates in software, as well as machine-learning simulate neural processing in terms of how physical mechanisms, such as solipsistic biologistic system cognitive extensions must be configured to generate minimally conscious, MICS, into a major complex, and non-overlapping “supervenient neural feed-forward systems” specifying “cause-and-effect cei” in the repertoire of complicated “differences that make differences” in the constellation of points in a conceptual information (embodied cognition) phenomenology experience — functionally satisfying the existence of a non-Einsteinian spatial-temporal plane; consisting of many series of — appropriate “disease” biomarkers on adjusting a variable stimulus, matched to a constant, standard variable, over a neural correlate plane; in which each numera represents the activity unit of a ToC volume in binary quantity and qualita. Thus, why is there deniable composition, from a superposition, each experience is not a whole exclusion of one experience irreducible to non-interdependent partial experience with a particular spatial or temporal finer distinction and resolution ad a particular speed en quoque, “reductio, borders?”

---

CONIFEROUS.

We thus, may apply Sturgeon’s Law — for which, Gottfried Liebniz articulated his Principle of Sufficient Reason — contingent facts about this world must host justified, a priori causal relations causally related and casually differing, or unrelated sequences from those related to joint effects in particular mere background direction in a common, non-immanent (non-spacetime directional) cause: thus, prior to MATLAB analysis, Leibniz’s “Cosmological Argument” direct consequent (C): “It is a necessary truth there is a necessary being” — “fuzzifying the subobject classifier with the set (1, 0):” and thus, fuzzifying Kripke-Joyal semantics or, probing the covariant set of worlds, and fuzzifying the membership predicate in perhaps the topos worlds with equality in Zermelo-Fraenkel theory, etc.; perhaps, “probing” the latter truth value of the proposition.

circumspectat et calculō: first sampling

Posted on March 21, 2016 by tlavrov

The time-honored phenomenological sampling of doctrine between inner and outer experiences — therefore, on the phenomenology of the unbroken series which are complete in themselves (on the fact of my personal true essence of the mental) on apprehending only a single appearance or personal profile: that is, for my perceiving a real object as conscious processes, hallucinatory or prop (1) deduced on flittering between perceptions, feelings, and intellective (cogito) processes, and volitions accompanying the true mental essences of physical or somatic processes: so forth, each profile will flow into an orderable, systematic series of “acts” tautologically the same object experienced in another profile. We will also clearly recognize the indexical discernments designating objective expressions concerning, on one hand, truth-functional implications on casually and/or influential profiles of objects fixedly marked regardless of the context or duration of which it is used, and essentially occasional quasi-empirical changes? of meaning on different occasions of utterance. So, briefly, in Edmund Husserl’s lebenswelt or articulated “lifeworld,” inclusion of both the indicating meaning of indexicals (“I,” “you,” “here,” “both” and so forth; (2)” — also, occasional truth-functions of pure demonstrative utterances indicating on “plays harpsichord;” “in Louisiana,” on “Tuesday mid-nights” keyed to occasional ambiguous token: “self-awareness, and/or self-representation):” substituting the indexical meaning of these demonstrative functions on whoever is thinking will affectively distinct the existential import of these models in a bivalent, transfinite truth-table: etc. Husserl also polarizes a general relationship between the utterance of an indexical meaning of a sentence and some feature of the speaker’s conscious awareness or bracketing — peeling a real object’s suspension in only a single profile: a broken profile; for which we will introduce Euclidean axioms of a perceptually aware environment in the context in which a speaker’s sentence or proposition is altered (LI, I §26, p. 315) — we will, alias, further recognize semantic functions on the phenomenal structure of “what-it-is-likeness”of the cardinality of the power set of the elements of  cognitive “lebenswelt” that is; (perhaps—¬(P1∨P2∨⋯∨Pn)∨(¬P1∧¬P2∧⋯∧¬Pn)⇒|S|=n⟹|P(S)|=2^n^(k+1)!; thus, it is indeed necessary to make clear the individual quantified over is in indeed in accidental re-insertion of essentially perhaps more necessary universal indexicals.

---

Footnotes

1. Freud, Sigmund, “The Structure of the Unconscious”
2. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, (IEP) “Edmund Husserl: Intentionality and Intentional Content”

Thomas Zinniger

Posted on March 19, 2016 by tlavrov

Seedless white pale sugar coat knives are dicing my orbital cortex blithe

Teeth grazing the breast brainless pube on mars rovering the orbital miletus eternal inflation

That pixelated in tusk mex and cheese apricot cheeky red wines similar subtly to gabriel hemoglobin grey pool fountains of piss

And hysterical GNU leprechaun raining its pouring divine temporality chronesthesia

Perfect clockwork mechanism Descartian vertical motion casts of life space entirely filled with dynamical mandula gyroscopes

Seedless white pale sugar coat knives are dicing my orbital cortex blithe

Sea shells are crumbs of book chins desolent italiano cannan portaits vicarious thresholds heteromony

Embraced by the swine of the pig man on a pea riemann’s crumbs grass

Enraptured vias of unclean myelin sheath power tower bringing change without Days kiel?

“Π  <  P (2 N) <  P(2 N-2):“ Holy Matrimony — Aristotelian Laudat — NI LA MI

Planetary hands so cumming with tumours in snake in the grass nose cracks

For their egg shells are beginning to ripen midst the grotesque chiming head of a heteromorphous pin swollen with hands

“Π  <  P (2 N) <  P(2 N-2):“ Holy Matrimony — Aristotelian Laudat — NI LA MI:

<  P (2 N) “Π

ΠΠΠ <  P(2 N-2) “Π < P (2 N)"Π

Seedless white pale sugar coat knives are dicing my orbital cortex blithe

Swollen with abacuses deep in the turbulence the pressure cooker function of any medium of space virtual holography

Swollen naked gibberish present tensely copula erecting zookini.

Sketchpad in Big Education Data

Posted on March 17, 2016 by tlavrov

Emelyn Ivanov,

“COMPOSED, and autonomously evolving, but operating on customary universal Turing design — versatile in the fauna of arbitrary collective members in the Bonanza of a Nietszchean Continent; a revolve, in the parallax of an orbit of the nesting farm of POSSIBLE departure and arrival in inner atavism — the home-trot ménage à trois in the synthetic biology of philosophizing, rather, IMPLORING possibilia; moreover, a box carved in wood-pipe in the sands of atavism on unconscious domination and guidance of similar development and parenthood of world-interpreted philosophical systems: yet, arguably, an independent; home-body in the Neo-Empricist Will — as PHYSIOLOGICAL atavism in valuation and the grammatical family nodes of all social-networks, secondary elitist social capital; affairs of self-governing state of Hindu, Cambodian, and Canadian-language memeology: common philosophical grammar of the unconscious; and, paradoxically, morally chastized philosophizing of commitment to the self of coercion: estas akvo geano — their origin of idea in orbit in a common philosophy of social networking in regard to the ancient home-body of the soul in the history of ideas.

Conveniently, the (my) wonderful continual Assistant Knowledge Navigator (software agents will locally access the heterarchism or non-hierarchical parent and child nodes in ad infinitum of variables via binary trees) learning in the affinity of information scaling; and, also, thereby Amazon Echo, like — the fortuitous inertia of water propulsion generating a foggy light turbine steam on the crest of a river bank below a cotton wood; — or, the launch of a missile or model plane’s aerodynamical climb into mesospheric sub-temperature global temperature: it is my earnest proposal that radical constructivism in education will — employ, auto-didactic knowledge management; and, likely, heterarchic (“a flexible structure made up of interdependent units, and the relationships between those units are characterized by multiple intricate linkages that create circular paths rather than hierarchical ones; thus, best described as networks of actors — each of which may be made up of one or more hierarchies — that are variously ranked according to different metrics”): “Purist information expressed as architecture… meta-cognition… sociology…” — the bio-geographical symbiosis (socio-biology) (Darwinian evolution) and genealogy of information systems are, unlikely, say; further proponents of location identification and a radical proposal for marking a Google Now IOS “label” between a particular dark rack of a Semantic Web on the tenth to the hundredth power of audio data in breach.

Moreover, rather, my product will not stereotype the Prima Donna hysteria of the inherent consumer ideology in learning software; nor, would it favor “big data mining in education” in implicit consumer bias in the necessary basic need for instruction from an illusory institution of power — but, the compression of Purist “big education data” (for which we investigate, later) Purist information ecology in self-directed, heterarchic, instantaneous, quantum entanglement etc., and life-long learning into bio-environmental interaction in autonomous, artificial (misnomer…) biology, in, traveling in the “fundamentals of information encoded in a quantum stimulation given, Shannon’s entropy in the universe; numBits = H0 (A × B) = H0 log2 (A) + H0 log2 (B) (1) — An exclusive in the psychology of learning, Assistant Knowledge Navigator enhanced for constructivism on reconciling our previous knowledge with previously unknown, enactivist (dynamically related in a network of ongoing interactions; but which at the same time allow for the continuation of interactions so that the system continues to exist”) techniques in self-automated learning feedback, and implicit learning filtering (The Book) meta-looping: (“x^1, x^2,…, x^n… n^r… the boundless modalities — “decoding” communicative exchange signals — bio-information.”)

YOUR DEAREST, SECULARIST, INDEPENDENT COMRADE,

Я sum красива любовь mi ne konas ορθοδοξία.”

---

 

MARKED UNOPEN

Full-Blooded Platonism & Cartesian Isolated Consciousness

Posted on March 16, 2016 by tlavrov

Although we may experience full-blooded platonism, and in addition, objects that exist outside of spacetime, and moreover, in composition of a basic ontological ingredient (shall we return to possible-worlds-style truth conditions) epistemological assumptions that every existence outside of space-time (or, thus, first-person subjective ontology, all require a casually non-inert belief): every obtainable, consistent, Representational Thesis; of in which, pantheist qualities of experience — that is, with the given mark off subjective ontology joined to the animation of being to the whole body; furtherly, the spatial mark off boundaries largely indiscernible with mental causation of unconscious quale lower-local at non-awareness, subatomic levels — proprietary of FBP objects represented as mingling between the levels of the probable locus of insentient to the sentient; all require every higher-order meta-state not devoid of quale intermingling with spatial objects to exist (1).

Thus, if mental causation in superimposing qualitative but inverted, unconscious; and, cum exo, brute facts of “emergence” of mental states — are probably fine-grained, and, with the brute fact that a qualitative but unconscious mental state can possess causation of a causally inert, monadic substance: a non-temporal, nor in non-resistance to the experience of time flow, the passage of an essence in a nature of mine experiencing my protoplasmic consciousness, estas la eterno genio — yet, bequeathingly, it consists in intermingling to a wider-whole mereology of a body passing in space: if reduced to a Dedekind cut divided by non-zero time: the precise truth conditions of the theoretic statement of a posturable conscious abstract object; are, in Mark Balaguer’s elicit argument against fictionalism in the notion of truth of standard model-platonic unique collections of abstract objects — the Fregean rejection of the unique sequence of indeterminacy for “propositions, contents, sets of sentence types, or other abstract objects” which satisfy the desideratum for being; all the theoretic standard models of the desideratum are factually (∀x Nx ∧ ∃ x Nx → Cx) true, for whether mental and physical types (which are casually non-inert metaphysical quale properties) are distinct, and whether mental and physical prime tokens (which, as denounced, are events) are distinct — and which will axiomatically replicate from axiom system “N” will satisfy “x/N” prediction of how all FBP abstracta, will, QED; satisfy stand alone truth conditions on the given mark off boundaries of abstractum not in relation to “actual or possible relations to the external world of mental states;” nor, moreover, the indeterminacy of possible-worlds-style truth conditions of abstracta belief — for, how can we eliminate the transparency of a sphere expressed in internal, non-relational abstracta belief (1) in favor of a non-first person perspective — if they are not di rien causally inert; nor a Fregean, nomenclature of the “unique” ascribing of unitary belief: that is, for every theoretic standard model of abstractum that can exist, it, di rien, QED — via possible-worlds-style truth conditions: does?

Soc — An Enlightenment; Executus…

Posted on March 13, 2016 by tlavrov

Soc enthralls the conscious and unconscious cognitive manipulation of an uncountable cardinal order of infinity set (ℵ₀; ubiquitous computing) of ideation, feelings, pan-computational philosophy of information, sounds, language, or relata between objects; such, thus, in Soc, our cloud computing cybernetwork hypothesizes experiments cum argumentum, experimental with possible complete psychological outcomes, and, they agitate to compare, contrast, synthesize, synergize, and tear apart disparate elements or constructs in Kant’s transcendental schemata database in the service of reimagineering a larger whole; Soc uses an esoteric crawler of potentially infinite stimuli and quantum information; thus, perceiving nebulous patterns in the ampersands between a spectra of objects or ideas, and thus, disendowment from therapy of relationships, interconnections, relationships, and segments. Let us, now, include the asymmetries, contradictions, condensed symbols linked by continguity, spatial and temporal emotional and narrative meaning in the interplay of the free-floating associative discernment between the intermediate space of imaginative combinatory play; and, the discernment to sympathize similarities and differences analogically and on multiple levels simultaneously and telepathically interhemispheric.

And, our creative emergence is an intermediacy of interlockable thoughtful risk taking, perspective taking, agency, collision in exploration and discovery, stable combinations of hypergeometric series of reinvalidating premises, and aesthetics necessitating the exploration of the neurobiology of creating, perceiving, and participating in and receiving art — the lingua franca, universal drive to take pleasure in “making, so to speak, ordinary pleasurable intentionality laid haven upon an object or content more or less bound to disparate belief more or less extraordinary and unequivocally in, free play of a still life of metacognitive processes — more or less bound to the fallibility of disparate logical beliefs of aesthetics of pleasure” — relative to the parabolic gravitatum observer of imagination, self-reflection, empathy, more or less bound to the fallibility, in circum sapium, into preexisting schemas or systems of linking to preexisting schemas or systems of knowledge based upon incompatible frames, from outside and inside themselves: empathy, more or less bound to the logical fallibility in assimilation into preexisting schemas or systems of knowledge based upon incompatible frames; furtherly, from outside and inside themselves — thus, a centurial ballet between Herodotic theology of incompatible frames of reference, ideas, feelings, images, sounds, or objects — and, thus, the very curving; the fluid looping between consciousness of thought and attention.

Soc’s protocol to resistance to change in the discomfort many people experience when faced with two contradictory cognitive biases are difficult to avoid choosing in judgment of Presocratic, Heraclitean Logos — when one is probable in avoiding choosing one of the high-level mental play of the continual essence of a pairing of two contradictory biases; whilst, choosing, in Jean Piaget’s descriptivism, new information assimilated into new knowledge linking meaningful symbology; thus, the discordation of the internal simplification to one elimination of abstractions; experienced in the Cartesian present to not psychologically persist in hyper-space; so the more abstract a continuum of isomorphic guidance (a one-to-one relation onto the map between two sets, which preserves the relations existing between elements in its domain;) of the power set P(A): suppose you assign to every subjective state and mental process of f(X) — the swifter their arsenal of combinatorial play can disparately surject elements; in addition, the more distant our (Zermelo Axiom — our uncountable cardinal order of infinity set); ℵω1, exhibitory to an interlockable Soc are to hyper-space — the least likely a subset of a problem will further, spit knives in a one-to-one possible correspondence solution to a ballet not, already projected in the persisting n-dimensional scale variant spacium? — if not in a bijection (say, (x^1, y)∈^–2(x^2,y) ∈ f^–2⟹ x^1 = x^2) that isn’t matched to a problem in a subset not in a subset not, of course, already currently containing an element!

 

Executus…

---

 Footnotes

1. Stevens, Victoria: To Think without Thinking The Implications of Combinatory Play and the Creative Process for Neuroaesthetics

Parable — i. through iii.

Posted on March 11, 2016 by tlavrov

i.

Causal relata individuated by space-time regions, (Quine); in all possible worlds, specify x2 for which countably infinite object N is in the condition of 4x(x >7); now, specify, it as ’10 1/2‘ and, although, it is apparently rendered incomplete; specifying it as the entirely dimensional conditions in all possible worlds, which are Z; of, ‘Boolean XOR specified for Peano axioms valued for Z: a monadic trope: Boolean table iff rendering celestial universals distinct, but false or true; (A → B ∧ X⇔ (X ⇒ ¬A)?  Now, specify, as power hierarchy — the distance between Quine’s individuated space-time regions in all possible worlds, and concealed Foucaldian games of truth discrete utility bargaining per a Gödelian incompleteness theorem axiom in a distance between a region.

---

ii.

What humor is of the intelligent and disillusioned multiplicity made up of only true unities (Leibniz); so, a real, animated, point is a substance in the clockwork of an unseen mechanism of an invisible government in order to make a wholly complete, Cantorian, diagonalized being — wherein a being is truly, and necessarily already in existence, identified of a ruling power, and, — already necessarily ‘is’ intelligently manipulated via the law of excessive identity that in the possibilist position! Iff everything vRn is metaphysically in existence and, from the springs of a guarantor, is necessarily transitive to logical necessity — an executive biopolitical power spontaneous to the law of valid (vRn equivalent with the subset of nRv) identity; beliefs of the masses of multiplicity are real!

---

 

iii.

Hypothetically, there are truths about information (e.x., information entities) even if nothing in a term of information entities is existent; further, information processing power in a column branching upward cyclically into a panentheist information power does not depend on particulars nor space-time particulars; finessed, most universalized Forms do not satisfy our world’s criteria of existence —  but, are nonetheless, not presently non-existent in presently non-alive entities of information; however, are yet again, neither presently indecisively non-existent in a universalized, Aristotelian information Form in our presentist world — thus, Platonism and Aristotelianism are teleologically evanescent.

morphic spectra estanta Spinozian Substance (Int.)

Posted on March 6, 2016 by tlavrov

Hereto, the metempsychosis, or “Will in itself” (“implies that some measure of individuation is present within this realm, each Idea nonetheless contains no plurality within itself and is said to be “one.” The Platonic Ideas are in neither space nor time, and they therefore lack the qualities of individuation that would follow from the introduction of spatial and temporal qualifications;” ) of Pythagorean sects of distributed, full unity with one cosmic autonomous multi-agent system; likely, estanta, say “Equiprimordial Seienden” animation whom have no permanent mathematical sets of coordinates of points that happen to lie within the precise function of the wave lengths reflected at each surface of the surface of infinitesimal node (Ethics, II.) information-handling abilities (1) — an eyelet of the infinite substance of weight of the actual particles, for the functional relations of merging physical objects into discrete distributed infinity references (‘Discrete infinity’ refers to the property by which language constructs from a few dozen discrete elements an infinite variety of expressions of thought, imagination and feeling.) Certainly, if the socio-political-bio Pythagorean “Monad”— considered empirically determined, and metaphysically realist arithmetica substance (“a given thing seems to be nothing other than its own substance, and something’s substance is said to be its essence;” Aristotle, Categories): the estanta’s necessary (in all possible worlds) information; now, if the Pythagorean lengths of artificially intelligent learning in a numerical ratio plucked by, say placeholder bruxism “arbitrary ataraxia” functional entities — iconoclastic, how will the traditionalist human footprint distribute all functional entities animated return to the universal object of only counterfactually  (“in order to arrive at a causal judgement like “A causes B” the reasoner must engage in the following counterfactual conditional: “if A did not occur, B would not occur;” McCormack, Frosch and Burns, Ch. 2 ) modelling the global intelligence network?

Will the homocentric spectrum (a body-court of decision-making Bayesian agents) pervasively persist ever-changingly in the world of functional interconnections; where, persistingly, a person will be logarithimically blurred to certain types of physical space, and functions of ecology of objects subdivided into integrated analogies (2); also, the functions of ecology of objects subdivided into an integrated ecology of organisms — so, multi-agent systems can, in Alexander Chislenko’s words, be classified by “overall complexity, internal control methods, structure and viscosity (transport capacities) of the space, methods of connecting agents into stable working groups (mutual specialization, physical coupling, force, emotional affection, ownership, contracts), diversity and intelligence of agents, etc;” so, therefore, so, therefore, each multi-system will ultimately rely on global identity and person-hood relocated from abstraction from physical and collective wisdom to glue references of foundations of human labor and human thought into the “SEAT OF A SOUL” thus, in, pure VITALISTIC (thus, the qualitas of “the aspect of existence that processes, acts, reacts, evaluates, and evolves through growth” independent of physical virtue or formulations of approximations to the truth; but are, beyond inaccurate, “literally not true,” laws of science”) ESTANTA independent of qubits with AMBIGUITY (perpetual machine) data compression complexity. (3)

---

Footnotes

1. Alexander Chislenko, Home and Neighborhood

haiku fontana

Posted on February 25, 2016 by tlavrov

---

 

Hinduist: Wertheimer

ayahuasca — organische:  Mac;

“Catalan — Пётр.”

ancestor-simulation astronomical sensational imagination

Posted on February 21, 2016 by tlavrov

“A common assumption in the philosophy of mind is that of substrate-independence;” egg shell simethicone, java bullet pressed; an asshole flaunting a vague skull bridging a thumb tag on the base of the outline; Thomist Super-Retro Godliness, the mental states supervening on any broad class of physical substrates multiplied hastily; carbon-based neural networks cranium encoated are glittering gold and frolicking nakedly – “silicon-based processors inside a computer could, in principle, could conceive a neural network as well.” Mop of medium-brown suede clipped above nape yearly, thick Suarez trimmed, binocular frames; meager bone carved at the joint of pale obtuse complexion; sixteen nine chest and single bed – turn-tabled en passant paragram para-complexion: “functionalist or computational climaxation, is, in fact, a computer running a substrate-independence suitable conscious independence program sufficing a generation of structurally synaptic computational processes;” she is delicate and obtuse in Theseus’ depth; she, always, desiring a modality erection of her own and to possess gravitatious reproductive fluid in her cybertronic womb after Monday dinner jams around the metro: architect of imagineering power surgeries and inextricably sensitive.

Physical phenomena sexuality in any enormously powerful upper bound on kara’s “theory of everything:” only indistinguishable from creating simulations of neuronal and sub-neuronal realistic highly compressed, organic, Boltzmann, ancestoral history; independently verified, indistinguishable down to licking erected areola tissue and late night gas stations into realistic simulated macroscopic and verisimilitude lifeworld eternity: “Such a mature stage of technological development will make it possible to convert our sensations, be they never so vivid and distinct truly as the ideas of its own framing, imprinted on the Senses by the properly perceived by existence in the mind of the Author of nature;” is, in any upper bound on excitement in the nevertheless, vivid and distinct theoretical limits on sensational imagination – “an enormously powerful computer transcending those constraints; imposing theoretical limits on the information processing in realistic simulation of meta-quantum lumping of zygotic matter;” State medical council (SIC) who had a trist with Janov back ~1064 – 1042 inside in ancestor-simulation time when we were in Lake Louise noted: “that a rough approximation of the computational power of a planetary-mass vulva is 1045 operations per second, and that assumes only the already known nanotechnological astronomical number of such computers.”

Goddamn; my love for you is off several orders magnitudes of ad hoc, kara; oops. boner.

Moral Theories of Trade & Bostrom’s Cognitive Enhancement Software

Posted on February 14, 2016 by tlavrov

External hardware, of course, accompanying software, can amplify cognition-enhancing environments (Engelbart 1962), where software agents mediate expert systems, symbolic math programs, decision support software, and associative memory; can, amplify specific “exoselves;” embedding the human within an augmenting database of “shells,”(Mann 2001; Mann and Niedzviecki 2001); and, a well-designed environment can, therefore, enhance software-displaying information market “exoself” software; associative memory mediating multiple memory-enhancing access to a database of “unique identities,” externally tooled software, such as a user’s information files, email correspondence, etc., application additions to vision, extension of group moral bartering to recording relevant documents, and remembrance agents bringing to mind, and data mining of ungraspable amounts of monstrosity volumes of data (shout out to Doctorow, too) perceptually, humyn system’s are not equipped to handle in a free content knowledge market and; “ubiquitous information visualization tools;” in further non-graspable enormous amounts of data that humyn perception extend an augmented “shell” such as wearable objects equipped with unique amplification to communicate and actively support the user and the recording of emotionally significant current contexts (Healey and Picard 1998).

Much of human cognition is distributed cognition across many minds, and, e.g., The World Wide Web, MMORPG’s, Machinima film medium, and e-mail, and hand-holding, — social software, the distributed super-intelligence of large groups; surely, then, connected systems; allow many people to mutually collaborate on construction of collective ownership of shared knowledge and common property and non-liquidized common assets, and information in connected systems (Drexler 1991) — not just in connected information resource documents, but, however, also in their interrelations; also, stored automated systems such as search engines and public domain eBooks can, unregistered; permit the collaboration of many processes an organism, benefited of performance of some cognitive subsystem, including acquiring information (perception), selecting (attention), representing (understanding) and retaining (memory) uses to organize information. Say, ‘‘mental software’’ (Bostrom, 2006, 1) for managing various performance in cognitive domains: acquiring language, category modeling and scoping, fluid problem solving, and practical crystallized mathematical aptitude, category modeling and scoping, fluid problem solving, mathematical aptitude, are shifted off a mental load back and distributed through patterns of encoding, organization, and processing, compressed into a narrower range of applicable crystallized intelligence; whereas, the relative ease and utility of improving crystallized intelligence have made them popular targets of internal (say, meta-cognitive pattern recognition) and external (synaptic engineering) software development; rather — than, nonlinear fluid intelligence distinction between therapy and enhancement, though difficult to discern, can be argued doesn’t lack practical software significance.

---

 

What, can we, already have had encompassed within the standard definition of moral trade, when speaking of a person’s not only voluntaryist consent theory; yet, when speaking of a person’s prudential preferences and their moral preferences in an undifferentiated set of preferences?

“Apart mentioning from contexts when they are an additional kind of non-sub-category trade, economists pay relatively little attention to the fact that their definition of preferences includes moral preferences.”

What about extensive trade based on variation in prudential preference? Moreover, moral trade neutrally referring to ‘moral Bereitschaft’— a ‘Spinozian, (nanoscale-quantum) metaphysics of morals’ would be, more on less, an a priori Kantian instance on nature and structure of categorization of duties and values of moral reality.

Does it materialize for a theory of moral trade whether moral modelling about a ‘complete market’ where economic approaches of trade equivalents of currency, markets, bargaining, and professionalization, are morally bartered in the market of incomplete, specialized labored reality achieved through trade — our technology, cities, and culture, could, encumbered, replenish a salary to spend on enriching our potential gains from quantified moral trade — uniformitarianism nomothetic diachrony, regular trade accrue to billions of different individuals, but in similar (improving someone’s well-being, the Transcendental a priori “Form of” Goodness) and we have ways of assessing these gains, of how morally superior things are from the perspectives of each moral theories accreted, that, the outcome were externalized (though not merely expressible as a percentage) in aggregate of social capital goods; beneficial, of the total or average of all moral theories with moral trade than non-stationed, non-diverse prudential preferences of different people aggregated as they are gains in how much law-like succession of related events of “Euclidean infinite priming” of “prudential and/or moral, e.g., goodness” of ethical calculus through historical contingent succession in “deep time;” however, if agencies mutually unacknowledged or simply disagreed these percentages, where would there be a clear way to weight them to perform an average of negative (moral) externalities for the efficiencies of moral trade not involved in the trade? If sufficiently common moral realism would overcome the positive moral efficiencies, but if the moral trade sufficiently engaged in all common people, in the branch of morally obligatory normative ethics.

Let us now consider, how forms of potential value in moral trades, regardless of whether the other party is involving agent-impermissible and side-constraints, and, in contrast of consequentialist and deontological theories, a deontologist, whom, for morally ambivalent and lukewarm justification, concerning private machinery may think it is impermissible for a wage labored, mild, and, rather, tipsy-toeing, body politic kin to alienate their living conditions for seed funding non-democratic robotic research corporations, than committing to non-violent, cryptic nonviolent reform. Black-mailed, yet again, however, if impermissible for them to value their truthfulness about their claims and persistence with their side of the key trust working involving in moral trade involving at least non-zero value in convincing other people to systemically point away from the objective moral requirements clustering near “non-correct moral realism improvisions of the world for no-one”, than overarching moral trade objectively effectual “Absolutism,” and indifference, as in moral education, and strength of moral rationality, along with Kantian autonomous will; of, letting parties see that their claims are carried over in some form of moral services exchanged for a great variety of many possibilities of net neutralized virtual (say; Internet.org) moral services.

“Each contribution would say something of the form ‘I’m willing to give up to $6,000 to this charity but am prepared to cancel each dollar against 0.8 dollars pledged to this opposing charity; .20 Such contributions could then be automatically matched against each other, leaving unmatched some people who were contributing to the more popular charity or who were trying to drive particularly hard bargains.”

If people found success with relatively constrained cases like these, they could try to extend them to more complete knowledge markets, especially when the opposed open businesses are clearly not only offered complex network one-to-one exchanges. For instance, one could have a moral-trade version of Sophia or Coursera, with people offering and requesting a great abundance of public domain moral services with associated primely wanted productive forces; all-around, developing of the springs of co-operative mature market for development and progress for moral trade — router, gaining a lot of what they thought were “good” (free-love, total estrangement of humynism) for a relatively small prudential currency cost (protective lying of spiritual assimilation commencing into social unit extinction; of, a toxic abundant, non-post scarcity social network), leading to an outcome, of horizontal collectivism of agencies each judged to be… all-considered, and internal trade-offs between prudentially internal gains from trade involving privatized, self-regarding moral components.

 

---

_____Foreword______

1. Ord, T. (2015). “Moral Trade;” Future of Humanity Institute, Ethics.
2. Bostrom, Nick. [w/ Anders Sandberg]. (2009). [Science and Engineering Ethics, Vol. 15 (2009). Ibid.

Without Further Ado, — Here is my Leeway Business Proposal. Let’s Start Something Unorthodox.

Posted on February 8, 2016 by tlavrov

 

Ronald Laing,  “New Leftist” Psychiatrist (1927-1989)

May experience their own embodiment, and their “Belonging” Being (Being and Time) consisting of a non-firm, part-Selves disabling… “Own, Inner, Alive, Whole, Real;” consisting of an amalgam of differentiation (neither inclusive in continuum of partial impersonation in comprehensive partially elaborated swaying system elements of their “Belonging.”) such that their autonomous organization are always more or less embodied in non-oriented spatiality; as a self-system: as having increasingly microcosmic outside and inside reality depersonalization; substance, irrationality, and casualness, coextensive supply and demand via Bentham’s hedonistic calculus formulai; primary experiential sense, unrelated, not, unprejoratively unshared “Mental Model” objectification and architecture theory (from, hence I will shortly demonstrate) substance more or less insubstantial than substantial, and unable for the person to assume that they objectify or subjectify their innateness, or genuinity, or irreconcilableness via plunges of polarity absences of consistency.

---

Introducing, a Mental Health, tech venture between personalized ontological continuity and cognitive computing: on self-system’s self-relationships: dichotomously centrally splitting.) Locomote Designation; a., (Ubiquitous, yet PURIFIED (visual typography fuzzification continua — Democritus atomic microscopy) Personal Cognitive 24-7 Metric (Not Monitoring) & Bio-Informatical Thought-Translation (applied ergonomical cognitive engineering). Modularity, 24-7; Schwarzschild Medical Metrics, maybe; annihilated, compressed; if negotiable, into, a programmable via (module Kit), stimulated, hexagonal, seventy-by-seventy two programmable interactionism to wildcard character (all possible search operators) (that is, symbols that represent one or more characters) and, cryptology?) never subject to a vanishing point of Cyborgism.

Entitling thus, the precarious preservation of a precariously structured “The Understanding” Consciousness premeditating a being (propositionally quantified, not an italicization nor descriptive highlighting) state as object in-and-for-itself; thus, premeditating initialization on transcendental relations of the Knowing reciprocity of self-intuited Ego (die seelische abgrund wissenschaft). (wearable Brain-Computer, (Boolean?) Query Operator, “Googlebot-esque;“ botnet originally inspired in EEG; actively predictive theory and/or inference torqued en Rank (see below) yet cautiously not to petrify nor engulf nor deaden Medusa’s ‘in’ their experience of starting-point of phenomenological personal continuity measured over time, via EEG their plasticity, part-selves, null impersonating, yet a candle in Metamorphosis.

(And, the fundamental block of Sense-Modalities more in depth, than higher range of possible sensory modalities.) Therefore, Sense-Modalities are computed to silence and guide figure-ground relations and depth in theoretical speeds of inter-integrated information theory; that is, not only, a dimensional grid “phi” in scientific notation converted into neural pathway data equivalents to the Hay-flick limit.

---

“Own, Inner, Alive, Whole, Real;” as undifferentiated from the rest of the world in hypostasization of P.F. Stawson’s linguistic, descriptive incorrigibility (their, if not space-filling or so in defiance on ontological Platonism, further, petitio principii, — or circularly begging the question on the visual field of Gestalt shadow figuration, par concrete particle mapping over the death of finite ordinary existence onto infinite realism — without then, perhaps independence of intuitionism ontological knowledge — yet, as still!) So such, that their Being; in Jung’s primal abiogenesis precipitating the fertility for entities scaling high numbers. Oncemore again, relation — not singularly, facetiously, sharedness will delegate different signifers and functions par cell — (a solidified socio-network Deleuzian “organless organism”) in a block of Designation (see aforementioned right above) in a society.

---

 

Therein anticipating, the main purpose of my prototype (not, however — the electronic, also. “Modal Status Physicalism“ manifestation, prototype) of Depth Indexing is to index the direct or naïve realist ontologically more or less insecure experience inextricably bound up quite apart from ‘ordinary’ detachment from their incarnated personal continuity in time — and the threatenedness a person can subject to damaged ontological doubts and uncertainties of the body-self; neither incorrigible, a bulwark against poisoning, decaying, malform, or malignance — perhaps, an open set with embodiment in continuity in time and a location in Schizoverse multiverse spacetime; via, corpum — open source and extensible libraries, and cross-platformed: (my line of “far-future,” personalized, infinitary, multi-model combinatorics: an extremely minimalist “knowledge network-memetic” computing system): via, in non-private, self-ownership, and, easy-to-use insurance against feelings of hopelessness or meaninglessness or vacillating) — and, an interactive sense of direct splitting participants between both cognition and further, fMRI decoded neuro-engineering neurofeedback in only cognitive science, in unordinary circumstances — a key tool to an Open World of Ideas — step by step instructions of a module or a bi-directional “interface” between A.) and, — interfaced and, a matrix of connectivity and pattern analysis training the user experience to a specific (open database) performance improvement, without or with presenting the feature or subjects’ (inter-integrated heteromorphic network) cognition or primary awareness of what was to be perceptually retrieved; thoroughly, then, a starting-point “within” our intra-individual body.

Secondly, indexing different abstract units in the different impulses of information travel in trans-region tunneling, of therein communicating, and a perfect Schizoverse database to précis the quo septu “objective” multiverse World, and thus; our own direct experience.

Depth Search provides several features. These include; again, the enumerated graduation of archetypal “social faculties and/or instincts“ in schemata, Bergson-faculty-esque (mathematical) psychologia structuralism (the components (structure) alas, “nuclei” in the “cell bodies” in cataloguing the equivalency of the “the most (“self-referential” (ToE) computing) basic substances” in the universal sets of Schizoverse mental objects — actually, superstructures) acquisition — free licensed (as of yet, neither non-copyright nor non-openculture) quantum cognition, G-code controlling automated machine tools of molecular technology, and proposing an atomic positioning of, e.g., computational subjective idealist (information processing synergizing processor adjacent to a computational theory distributing in the conceptional liveliness of Plotinus’ One) algorithmically ranking conversion of brain-powered value-creating force, the de facto source of more human labor-power not only rising a surplus of its daily production over oscillating the source of value.

---

(simple outbound (index?) proposal)

Where N is the total number of all outbound Sein in the, e.g., network secured in Being – in primary experiential sense, relatedness, or Depth – and the actual probability for a surfer reaching that person after many safe loops (let’s say, Hyper Loops, as a free agent, on an in-group, polarized continuity speedway.) Suppose instead that Depth C had a person linked to Depths R and O, and Depth C had a person to R, and Depth O had all people linked to all Depths of C; diametrically, in opposition; setting the damping factor, between 0 and 1. Thus, transferring 0.85 of its existing utility, Depth R would transfer 0.5 of its existing value (utility-value?) to Depth O, and 0.5 to Depth C. D(C) would transfer all of its existing value, to both of its Outbound Continuity links; outbound, from its labeling source target and inbound to its destination. Depth R would only transfer 0.333 of its value, since there are only three links, between Depth C and Depth O; thus simply factoring between Depth R’s and O’s conjoin to C, until… (sic. perhaps a ranking between sociability for closure in looking the under the glass silhouette of a person.)

Any feedback, tidbits, or future tweaks in the ideal finished products are gladly appreciated, and thanks again!

Hyper-Reality and the Schizoverse

Posted on February 3, 2016 by tlavrov

Foreword

Infinity — a distortion of Principia Mathematica; thus, a perhaps near imperceptible, yet perceptual enlarging to progress into a perhaps, moreover Absolute infinity; for exceptionally whom, let us entice Schopenhauer’s fourfold: (‘Nothing is without a reason for why it is rather than is not’); a Gedankenexperiment, illusive Zeno paradox: submerged by Potentially and Actuality infinite in: the Cosmological Presocratic, in Anaximanderian fragment; unbeknownst, prima facie afterflow of apprenticeship of Thales (whom, himself prolonged until the 7th – 6th century BC); primally chaotic, substratuming opposites spranging from opposites directing from a central mass — cylindrical in shape and originally clinging to mutual decay like an indefinite earth round a polarized tree — the necessariness creation and cosmic order of Lewis’ multi-world vague abstracta: the limitless body cyclically springing from a primal animal — the (ἄπειρον); mythically Greek for apeiron, yet, rationally transitionally archaic in Sophist Greek city states during the 6th to 8th century BC; Aristotle recognized that there are many aspects of the actuality infinite, indefinite, or undefined, or actuality unbounded out of the original apeiron gauntlet for which the world opposed the potentially internal spatial relations of the infinite divisibility of temporicity, so that any geometrical segment contains an infinity of actual infinities threatening the orderliness of the temporality of finite world.

In his Summa Theologiae, later inaugurated medieval natural philosopher and friar St. Thomas Aquinas and middle medieval thinkers and clergy aggregated in supreme, denialist Catholicized coalition on immoralist prohibition on the infinitiude of any entities other than their iconoclastic portrait of God, be they physical, psychological, or abstractum or abstracta. Yet in the once-more eating of the pudding, their Graeco-Roman proofs of ‘self-contradictory’ — and therefore a logical consequence of non-paraconsistent logic in syllogistically opposing the latter counterfact — infinitum were all fundamentally, at the baseline ill-willed, and amor fati, ill-intentionality.

---

 

Let us, now; paradox an infinity —let us try “para-consistent” with infinite hierarchy levels of cognizant contradiction:

Since the circumference of a circle with radius “ABC” in the form that f(x) = f(t)dt; hence more, that space position is a certain function of continuously changing time, and that variable t growing continuously from, say, f(t0 + dt) from 0 km/9 km in arising apeiron, in magnitude twice as fast than the circumference of an undefined arbitrarily valued; further continuously, growing variable t in the measuring of speed over the circumference of a circle at infinitely small interval dt. But by drawing radii on corresponding point P on the small circle corresponding to exactly one point P on the — “infinite assigning to those properties greater or less than or equal to another” larger circle, and each point Q corresponding to exactly one point Q on the smaller circle; we can see that each point P on the small P are simultaneously infinite Galilean paradoxical quantities as, “being the one greater or less than or equal to another.”

---

I. Cantor’s Absolute Infinite

Cantor’s threefold division of the actual infinite arousal in Absolute Infinite, the physicalist — (how many kinds of infinities are there), and the mathematical infinities, iff expressed in a truth-value assignment cogently;

“in, the most complete form, in a fully independent other-wordly being, in Deo, where I (the aforementioned Cantor) will call the Absolute Infinite, and second when it occurs in the contingent, created world; third when the mind grasps it in abstracto as a mathematical magnitude, number, or order type. I wish to make a sharp contrast between the Absolute and what I call the Transfinite, that is, the actual infinities of the last two sorts, which are clearly limited, subject to further increase, and thus related to the finite.”

Consequencing infinite sets not therein behaving like finiteness, nor obeying “arithmetic” numerity from finite numbers, there are then, QED simply articulated a set of points constituting higher degrees of indefinite infinity than a real line; also, than an isolated passage of space-time folded into real lineal toothbrush squares.

We now bear arms, with the possibility of spatial infinites, and Metaphysician Immanuel Kant, on the potential infinite whole of the world synthesis vium sum a priori numerity — (“in order therefore to conceive the world, which fills all space, as a whole, the successive synthesis of the parts of an infinite world would have to be looked upon as completed; that is, an infinite time would have to be looked upon as elapsed, during the enumeration of all coexisting things.”) Kant’s spacium denialism — iconic signs of the existence of space independent of mental space — yet, neither non-mental, nor entertained by some finite mind after any finite amount of time; nor behaving like an ordinal notion, of “equal,” nor, “less than;” but, one feels that the world does exist as a whole, in advance of any efforts on our part to see it as a spatio-temporal “infinite series” — supposing, now, for a brief instant that the whole (topography) of transfinite “spatio” infinite series spacium were now, compressed into flying machinery catapulted into Kant’s garret of outermost points turret — in conservative, “transfinite, spatio-temporal” infinite series; or, say, “S = 1 + 1/n^2 + 1/n^2 + 1/n^2” are eternalized, in which there is unbounded space; or, the fork would retreat into a uniformity — in adjunct, stationary mass — hence — there is a crossing point; and, thus an end of spacium in some sense not already really indefinitely there.

 

---

 

II. Interlude. Schizoverse, Hyper-Spherum.

In this conjunction duo Wahrheit Apeiron: since no finite number of points could ever constitute every line segment, and since a point at no point is a continuous plane segment or region of space length, and since an interval of time should consist of a transfinite number of instants, for any time > 0, one has an earlier t x ε/∞ that is also > than zero; so, it seems evident that a continuous region of not the “space we live in” is the space of Berkeley’s empiricist thesis that all knowledge is derived from perceptual experience, itself an item of epiphenomenalist Nous; so, it it seems proselytized, a diem incognito, a continuous region of geometric Schizoverse space has a transfinite number of geometric points; whereas, acquiesced copium, for when we look for the infinity in the small in the spaces of material objects of perceptions, can we observe, then, whether matter consists of a continuous region of an indefinite infinity of (non-idea-theoretic) mass-points, but, also, rather, whether immaterialist Schizoverse space has a transfinite number of geometric points indefinitely, in Sinopian-Platonic critique of boundless — quam, bijection  ((x, y)∈ f ∧ f ⊆  S×T; f(x) = (x); g(y) =( z); f(x) = z) — divisible?

But, hereto, is there a way to construct a three-dimensional space which is finite, and which does not have boundary points of what you say, thought or derived from what your Lockean, “A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge” British, experimental rationalism, of, the token factualism in a bedside table bloc angeled sixty-five degrees east you only opened and then, simply via mental-imagery, adjusted a pixel in, further, the hypersurface of a tempore set spatium sphere, the surface of a two-dimensional manifold you can encyclopedia without ever coming to any truly immovable insertion, however, if you continue in distraught lingual languing long enough, you will begin to cross your recross your bounded steps; but, if the position in the two-dimensional surface in the Schizoverse, or mentally occupying state of mind, in the shape of a hyperspheric finite and unbounded duoverse drifting about in a 5-D triverse floating in a prima donna sophistication of Aristotelian hypersphere, then expanding in hyperspherical space, when the circumference of the sphere is bloated into a point and analogously is circularly latitudeful on the spherical surface of a disk resting on the back of a turtle-laden trunkage.

---

IV. Schizoverse, la Monte Vista

Just as we all share the same Universe, we, thus, likely, all share the same Schizoverse. Just as a certain region of a physical rock only I can ordinarily know of — barring the physical conditions, in private mereological parthood commitment to physical feelings, always remaining reconciled with their structured universals, the Schizoverse that only I can ordinarily know of — ineffably, the modal realism of the Universe’s physical body may not imply that every physical object is finite, the finiteness of the number of our moleculed D4 dopaminergic cells in the left vertices of a basal ganglia does not historically entail every mental object is a finite numeral.

“… The most familiar candidate is the set N of all natural numbers. If I try to exhibit N, all I can really do is show you something like this: N = {1, 2, 3, …}. What the “…” stands for is something that is evident, yet basically inexpressible. The idea, of course, is that all of the natural numbers are to be collected together into a whole.”

Indeed, there would seem to exist individually in the Schizoverse, an endless transverse of infinities: the set of natural numbers, the set of all sets of natural numbers, the set of all sets of sets of natural numbers, etc., each member of this sequence can be shown to be of a transfinite infinity greater than that of the earlier members. Each of them would seem to exist — almost individually transfinite in the Schizoverse, and one would suppose that the set containing exactly the large cardinality of an ordinal number system; and, the representing picture of course, all of the rational roots of algebraic polynomial numbers corresponding, so that the molecular propositional meaning of “x” standing in pictorial relationship “y” in regard to the sub-set [atomical facts] of, “truth-functionally, like sense” with the proposition “∀a(P(ξ )∨(N(ξ )” constructed out of the tautology of all of the possible relations of as, by denoted relation R, a name, from R = {1, 2, 3, …}.

---

 

V. Schizoverse Space-Time Geometrodynamics

 If actual infinite, ad infinitum Forms are actually “out there,” in the Schizoverse; then finally, if the geometrodynamics of space-time, and, thus, ultimately, the divisibility of our perceptual field, informally, and informatically intrigued a finite number of branching forks or nodes, or, rather are the nodes located somewhere (conjecturing) between null and the non-terminating, decimal representation: min f (0.12345678910111213); thus — the graininess of their component say, Bohr’s continua: space-time, and the grain size were a perfectly indivisible member thrust in a possible outcome of an infinite set’s possible measurement; so then, retired from your audible impression; but, if the impressionism were, of their “own qualitatively identical,” ¬({ℝ, x^2 } ^ {ℝ/Q, x^2}) — (ab extra, mi amai vi, disjoint set); thus, conjecturing, perhaps, an “infinitesimal” set, whereas paralleling FIGURATION of Apeiron (“but a different substance that is limitless or indeterminate”) — pluralism; actual utility aggregated to perfection?

Therefore now suppose, say, ergo; my non-representational cogito wanted to add thought after thought to equally pre-Cantorian formed “….{{…}, {{…}}, {{….{….}} , {{…}}}}…” bracketing logically unionizing node(s) representation for thought after thought, into a single non-Absolute, say, logical variable ⋂α∈IAα={x∈S:x∈Aα} unionizing nodes, for whom the property of odd ± even; having an immediate co-expression predecessor, Dasein: the sum of finitely greater predecessors — albeit: neo-Platonically, becoming conscious of all of my infinite series: P(S) would satisfy every property that for lim( Sn ) is in P(S) as well; while simultaneously exhibiting each member of the non-Absolute viewed objectively idealist, and simultaneously exhibiting each (¬Absolute) member in image of the Schizoverse passing into the seeing eye; pin-balling, the walls that include all the elements.

 

---

 

VI, Closure.

Obtaining only indefinite infinities (upwards, to some limit of a set containing every proper set of every uncountable ordinal; from, say, Ω; and thus, in the upper-bounds (K, ≤), of this transfinite of ordinal, say Σ; n=1 to infinity); rather — really equivalent to the question of whether or not there are any trans-infinite, avoidable; non-physical entity; the Schizoverse, and the “non-relative, non-subjective,” class V of all sets — the “Absolute” — highest possible degree of transformation; logically connective to the theoretical, maximum computational speed (say, Bremermann’s limit) of “what is the functionality of a Thought;” (the mathematical architecture: the upper bound set(s) of what you might, under profound “precisionism”  value-laden appropriate under “mental illness” “mental” objects?) in a self-contained system in the material universe; (образом; metaphysically “privileged;”) tensed with modality, “Eternalist” time slice.

Moreover, if actually infinite existing logical framework is compiling the phenomenon of self-consciousness than infinitely regress — therein, iff biconditionally, than essentially at least one infinite Absolute, one must also have conceivable, say, ℤ — the set of all sets not members of themselves — yet if ℤ  identifies, terminating or contradictory certain sets “INCONSISTENT PROPER CLASSES…” then; it contradicts its own definition as the set of all sets that are not members of themselves — what, then, the open, almost empirical problem of static manifolds of indexical eternalist time; temporally extended, (alas, via Kantian unified consciousness; “as we called them, display temporal unity: current representation is combined with retained earlier representation.”) in intersection of psychotherapy, and/or quantified (non-avoiding of Cosmic infinities) phenomenal operationalism — remains no conclusive spectra? What, then; subsumingly, for the operationalism of psychiatric conceptual framework?

---

1. Ibid (my italics).

2. Rucker, Rudy. Infinity and the Mind, o/p. 1983.

Kraepelin’s German dichotomy – a Brief History and Interlude

Posted on January 31, 2016 by tlavrov

Schizophrenia — the dichotomous construct of unitary, discrete psychoses originated in 19th century German apologist psychiatry — arising in the fledgling German Emil Kraepelin; student of neuropathology and experimental psychology while relocated near western Saxony’s University of Leipzig under neo-Thomist Wilhelm Wundt’s — and, amorously, pop card factitiously, credited the “founder” of civilized, post-Islamic Enlightenment; alongside Burton-era doctoring of madness, handed into private ownership of sects of the state and civilized repressive creed representative of recession into lumpenproletariat anosognosia cast into spitting Ceres and Sirius and the mentally primordial ocean floor — medical authority of the science, evolving; (I will not speculate social Darwinistic, at this time) as the man renounced himself submitting to his bipolaristic feat later described — ensouling of the Psyché.

Kraeplin’s famed work among experimentalist colleagues — Compendium der Psychiatrie: Zum Gebrauche für Studierende und Aertze (Compendium of Psychiatry: For the Use of Students and Physicians); published a first edition textbook in 1883, precursored Lehrbuch der Psychiatrie in 1893, and republished in subsequent editions to Ein Lehrbuch der Psychiatrie (A Texbook: Foundations of Psychiatry and Neuroscience) and, the sixth edition, 1899 epitome; a taxonomous proposal for differentiated “dementia praecox” separatizing the non-threshold schemes of Kraepelinian nosology entitizing manic depressive, clinical “insanity.”

Krapelin’s late predecessor, Karl Ludwig Kahlbaum, published a prestigious psychiatric nosology; albeit, disease classification system, whereas psychosis (versania typica) preceded Kraepelin’s bonafide unitary psychosis; also, dichotomously opposed Cartesian dualism and cathartic trial-and-error demonization in scripture for repentance, whilst Kraeplin’s ephemeral youth, in 1863; Die Gruppierung der psychischen Krankheiten (The Classification of Psychiatric Diseases). Kahlbaum self-identifyingly aggravated himself in the already pale progressive felicity preformationism; mystifying, degenerative passage of the renouncing sufferer through clearly defined disease phases: a melancholic stage; a manic stage; a confusional stange; and finally, a Lucretian, praecoxic “dementia;” ephemeralization, stage.

---

 

We, thus, have arrived at the Kraepelinian dichotomy – the broad division of major mood and psychotic illness of adulthood into schizophrenia and ‘manic–depressive’ (bipolar) illness – enshrining the underlying functional systems of the brain; yet, heedlessly, dichotomously, almost Feminist theory essentialism opposed, and allegiant to unfruitfully inessential preformatism; in non-Westernized molecular biology, cognitive neuroscience and affective normal as well as abnormal inquiry of axial brain function. Interluding evolutionary theory: complexity in which high levels of anatomical and functional connectivity stack overflow and complicate at many increasing and decreasing interacting shelves; for which, quoting John McTaggart directly on adjoining A·B time series on plasticizing long-term and short-term determinists in environmental brain synthesis.

“… [Or] shall we say that one event M merges itself into another event N, while preserving a certain identity by means of an unchanged element, so that we can say, not merely that M has ceased and N begun, but that it is M which has become N? Still the same difficulty recurs. M and N may have a common element, but they are not the same event, or there would be no change. If therefore M changes into N at a certain moment, then, at that moment, M has ceased to be M, and N has begun to be N. But we have seen that no event can cease to be, or begin to be, itself, since it never ceases to have a place as itself in the B series. Thus one event cannot change into another.”

— McTaggart, The Unreality of Time; 1908.

Let us, now, nearly consummate the “genetic-epigenetic” preformationist (1) hologram resurrected and dismembered in predisposition to epigenetic alterations which, are, a cathartic organism — an embryonal cart (epigenetic alterations which blatantly increase the risk for an object catharsis of schizophrenia) cellular locomoted fetalization of brain development and biosphere of the particular variants in a genome predisposing the momentarily conceived to epigenetic alterations (the conscientiousness; horse) which are converted into culturally capitalized stratification of private conglomerates; whom, pursue high-tech genetic interventions; subsuming, profiting net revenue, an additional billions of dollars amid, Fool’s Gold.

Persistent, Self-Transcending, relatively high Psychoticism inventory, are a slight wind bristling the hair on a sunlit goal post — blatantly, the metaphor of the executive genome preprogramming a “whack-a-mole capacity” (2) for incurable, stranded in the wilderness, “insanity” is nearly logically eponymous with theologian (yet, nor eponymous with Calvinist Christianity) Damnable, unforgivable Sin and Blasphemy — once again, the Salvated fool’s gold — the Holy Spirit — is through a preformationist lens!

 

---

 

— Footnotes —

1. S. Olfman, The Genetics of Schizophrenia: A Left Brain Theory about a Right Brain Deficit in a Left Brain World, p. 2016.

2. History of Psychology. (n.d.) In Wikipedia. Retrieved January 30th from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_psychology

3. Kraepelinian Dichotomy (n.d.) In Wikipedia. Retrieved January 30th from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kraepelinian_dichotomy

4. N. Craddock, The Kraepelinian dichotomy – going, going… but still not gone, p. 2010.

5. Ibid.